History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kranek v. Richards
2011 Ohio 6374
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • CSPO issued August 2010 against Richards for Christian and his family; CSPO based on two incidents within weeks; July 30, 2010 death-threat phone call and August 19, 2010 voicemail; Madison County juvenile court had custody jurisdiction over J.K., so CSPO should not cover J.K.; trial court stated J.K. would be removed from CSPO but judgment did not reflect this; Montgomery/Jefferson County judicial actions remanded for correction.
  • Record shows prior violent conduct: ashtray throw leaving scar and handgun display during custody exchanges; additional threats toward Nicholette.
  • CSPO permanent through August 3, 2014; appeal filed February 3, 2011; respondent- appellant Richards challenges portions of trial court’s findings and the inclusion of J.K. in CSPO.
  • Appellee Christian and Nicholette are petitioners for protection for themselves and children; two incidents cited as pattern of conduct under R.C. 2903.211(D)(1).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether two incidents constitute a pattern of conduct for CSPO Richards argues no pattern. Kranek contends two incidents suffice. Yes; two closely timed incidents establish pattern.
Whether custody/visitation issues were properly within the CSPO court’s authority Richards contends court overstepped; J.K. jurisdiction with Madison County. Kranek asserts court’s ruling valid within CSPO scope. CSPO must not affect J.K.; remove J.K. from CSPO; remand for correction.
Whether the court erred in not dismissing J.K. from CSPO Richards argues J.K. was under Madison County jurisdiction. Kranek asserts sufficient procedure to include J.K. Partial reversal; remove J.K. from CSPO.
Whether the trial court’s findings were against the manifest weight of the evidence Richards challenges credibility of threats. Kranek claims substantial evidence supports findings. Record supports CSPO; weight not clearly against evidence.

Key Cases Cited

  • McCue v. Marlin, 187 Ohio App.3d 1 (2010-Ohio-1298) (jurisdiction limits of CSPO where another court governs parental rights)
  • Couch v. Harrison, Note: provided in text (Feb. 12, 2001) (jurisdictional boundaries of CSPO vs. custody orders)
  • Parker v. Jamison, 2003-Ohio-7295 (2003-Ohio-7295) (temporary allocation of parental rights in CSPO context)
  • McKinley v. Kuhn, 4th Dist. No. 10CA5, 2011-Ohio-134 (2011-Ohio-134) (pattern of conduct requires two or more incidents)
  • State v. Bone, 10th Dist. No. 05AP-565, 2006-Ohio-3809 (2006-Ohio-3809) (closely related in time depends on circumstances)
  • Sims v. Dibler, 172 Ohio App.3d 486 (2007-Ohio-3035) (credibility of witnesses within weighing evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kranek v. Richards
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 7, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 6374; 11 JE 2
Docket Number: 11 JE 2
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Kranek v. Richards, 2011 Ohio 6374