History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kraemer v. Quality Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 36
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Kraemer, a pipe fitter foreman, was informed Quality would discharge another crew member (Huff) and Kraemer expressed he no longer wanted to be foreman.
  • Quality's VP told Kraemer, 'That's okay. You're done here, too,' and demanded Kraemer surrender the keys to his truck and his cell phone.
  • Kraemer filed for unemployment benefits on June 30, 2009; initial deputy denial alleged voluntary quit without good cause attributable to work.
  • Appeals Tribunal affirmed the deputy; the Commission reversed, holding Kraemer was discharged for reasons other than misconduct and thus entitled to benefits.
  • Quality appeals the Commission’s decision; the Missouri Court of Appeals affirms the Commission, finding Kraemer discharged for reasons other than misconduct.
  • Standard of review limits the appellate court to questions of law, with factual findings by the Commission given deference.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Kraemer quit or was he discharged? Kraemer quit by stating he no longer wanted to be foreman. Kraemer was discharged when the VP said, 'You're done here, too,' and Kraemer surrendered keys and phone. Discharged for reasons other than misconduct; not a voluntary quit.
If Kraemer left, is he disqualified from benefits? N/A N/A Not applicable due to the finding of discharge rather than voluntary quit.
Is the Commission’s factual finding that Kraemer was discharged binding on review? N/A N/A Yes; the court defers to the Commission’s credibility determinations.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cotton v. Flik Intern. Corp., 213 S.W.3d 189 (Mo.App. E.D.2007) (factual determination on quit vs. discharge)
  • Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. Crider, 304 S.W.3d 261 (Mo.App. S.D.2010) (credibility and witness evaluation in factual findings)
  • Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. banc 2003) (standard of review—weight of the evidence)
  • Miller v. Kansas City Station Corp., 996 S.W.2d 120 (Mo.App. W.D.1999) (discharge for reasons other than misconduct excerpt)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kraemer v. Quality Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 18, 2011
Citation: 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 36
Docket Number: ED 94885
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.