Kocher v. Campbell
712 S.E.2d 477
| Va. | 2011Background
- Plaintiff Edward Campbell was involved in a 2004 motor vehicle collision with Kocher in Spotsylvania County.
- Campbell filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy on October 1, 2005, without listing the personal injury claim as an asset or exempt property.
- Discharge was granted on January 6, 2006; Campbell later filed three circuit court complaints (Feb 2006, Apr 2006, May 2008) against Kocher for personal injuries, none of which served Kocher.
- The bankruptcy trustee reopened Campbell’s case in 2008; Campbell amended schedules to list the personal injury claim and claimed it as exempt.
- May 29, 2009 bankruptcy court order exempted the personal injury claim; Campbell argued final bankruptcy order abandoned the estate, asserting retroactive restoration.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Campbell had standing to sue after bankruptcy filing | Campbell maintained standing post-exemption. | Estate remained, so no standing to sue until exemption. | Lack of standing at filing; action a nullity; no standing retroactively cured. |
| Whether exemption restored the claim to Campbell and ended the trustee's control | Exemption restored the claim and bypassed trustee control. | Restoration only via exemption could occur; abandonment not shown. | Exemption on May 29, 2009 restored the claim to Campbell; before that, it stayed with the estate. |
| Effect of final bankruptcy order on retroactivity and tolling | Final order abandoned unadministered property, retroactively tolling limitations. | Exemption already removed asset; final order cannot retroactively toll limitations. | Final order did not retroactively toll; exemption had already removed the action from the estate. |
| Tolling of the statute of limitations given lack of standing | Nonsuits tolled limitations while action was pending. | No tolling where action was a nullity due to lack of standing. | Action filed while lacking standing is a nullity and does not toll the two-year period. |
Key Cases Cited
- Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 831 F.2d 1339 (7th Cir. 1987) (bankruptcy estate includes all debtor interests; extends to inchoate claims)
- Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 789 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1986) (estate includes inchoate causes of action)
- U.S. ex rel. Gebert v. Trans. Admin. Servs., 260 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 2001) (statutory assignments of estate interests; timing matters)
- Parker v. Wendy's Int'l, Inc., 365 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2004) (abandonment under § 554; value considerations of estate assets)
- Tavenner v. Smoot, 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2001) (exemption procedure governs when property is removed from estate)
- Brown v. O'Keefe, 300 U.S. 598 (1937) (abandonment principles and retroactivity not favoring debtor)
- Johnston Memorial Hospital v. Bazemore, 277 Va. 308 (2009) (standing determines viability; lack of standing yields nullity)
- Fowler v. Winchester Medical Center, Inc., 266 Va. 131 (2003) (Virginia standing and tolling principles for medical claims)
