History
  • No items yet
midpage
829 N.W.2d 522
Wis. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Kirk bought a 1998 Buick Regal in May 2007, financed via a retail installment contract ultimately assigned to Credit Acceptance.
  • Under the contract, Kirk owed $305.32 monthly for 30 months and defaulted by July 2007; Notices of Right to Cure were mailed to Kirk and a co-signor by certified mail.
  • Kirk's Notices to Cure were returned as unclaimed; Credit Acceptance repossessed the vehicle on April 8, 2008 and sold it at auction for $1300.
  • Credit Acceptance filed a deficiency action on November 17, 2008; the circuit court later dismissed that action pursuant to a stipulation.
  • Kirk filed this WCA action on November 17, 2009 alleging (i) improper cure notice/repossession, (ii) filing the deficiency action without cure notice, and (iii) filing the action knowing there was no right to a deficiency; the circuit court granted summary judgment to Kirk on the claim tied to the deficiency action and addressed other issues.
  • On appeal, the court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for damages to be limited to actual $1300, remand for attorney’s fees hearing, and for arbitration-related issues.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the WCA claims are time-barred Kirk Credit Acceptance Not barred; last violation occurred with the 2008 deficiency action.
Whether Credit Acceptance violated the WCA by filing the deficiency action without proper cure notice or knowing there was no right to a deficiency Kirk Credit Acceptance Summary judgment for Kirk; repo without replevin judgment breached contract and violated §427.104(l)(j).
Whether arbitration should have stayed the WCA claims Kirk Credit Acceptance Arbitration not required; waiver of arbitration found; circuit court did not err in denying stay.
What damages are available under Wis. Stat. §427.104(l)(j) and §425.304 Kirk Credit Acceptance Only actual damages or statutory cap allowed; actual $1300 not to be supplemented by statutory double-damages; remanded to amend judgment.
Whether attorney's fees must be decided at a hearing Kirk Credit Acceptance Hearing required to determine reasonable attorney's fees; remand for a hearing.

Key Cases Cited

  • Meyer v. Classified Ins. Corp. of Wis., 179 Wis.2d 386 (Ct. App. 1993) (waiver analysis for arbitration turns on overall conduct)
  • Frank Lloyd Wright Found. v. City of Madison, 20 Wis.2d 361 (1963) (arbitration waiver standards; arbitration may be stayed when referable)
  • J.J. Andrews, Inc. v. Midland, 164 Wis.2d 215 (Ct. App. 1991) (arbitration waiver; discovery and early litigation do not alone waive right)
  • Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle, 295 Wis.2d 1 (2006) (contract interpretation and standard for ambiguity (de novo review))
  • City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright Found., 162 Wis.2d 100 (1965) (waiver/standard for arbitration and contract interpretation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Feb 12, 2013
Citations: 829 N.W.2d 522; 346 Wis. 2d 635; 2013 WL 500401; 2013 WI App 32; 2013 Wisc. App. LEXIS 116; No. 2010AP2573
Docket Number: No. 2010AP2573
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.
Log In
    Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 829 N.W.2d 522