History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kirby v. Employment Security Department
320 P.3d 123
Wash. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Thomas, a security officer for PSS, was discharged for insubordination after refusing to write an incident report on June 10, 2011.
  • The Department denied unemployment benefits finding misconduct; the ALJ reversed, deeming the conduct a good faith error in judgment.
  • The commissioner remanded to address reasonableness of the directive, the circumstances surrounding the incident report request, and claimant’s motivation.
  • ALJ found Thomas acted out of apprehension and confusion, not intent to harm, and that the directive on June 10, 2011 was not reasonable.
  • The commissioner adopted the ALJ’s findings; the superior court affirmed; PSS appeals to the supreme court.
  • Court affirms agency decision that Thomas did not commit misconduct disqualifying her from benefits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Thomas’s refusal to write the incident report misconduct? Thomas acted from confusion/non-willful intent Thomas insubordinate; willful disregard of directions Not misconduct; good faith error in judgment
Was the June 10 directive to write the report reasonable? Directive was not reasonable given context and prior logs Directive reasonable from employer's perspective Not misconduct; order not reasonable under circumstances
What is the proper standard of review and burden of proof? Agency findings should be upheld if supported by substantial evidence Commissioner’s interpretation governs; deference to agency findings Findings supported by substantial evidence; proper deferential review maintained

Key Cases Cited

  • Harvey v. Employment Sec. Dep’t, 53 Wn. App. 333 (1988) (relevance of reasonable directives; misconduct analysis)
  • Peterson v. Employment Sec. Dep’t, 42 Wn. App. 364 (1985) (refusal to answer supervisor questions; intentionality examined)
  • Verizon Nw., Inc. v. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 164 Wn.2d 909 (2008) (administrative review framework; mixed questions of law/fact)
  • Hamel v. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t, 93 Wn. App. 140 (1998) (misconduct defined; good faith errors in judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kirby v. Employment Security Department
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Washington
Date Published: Mar 10, 2014
Citation: 320 P.3d 123
Docket Number: No. 69807-9-I
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Ct. App.