History
  • No items yet
midpage
436 U.S. 658
D.S.C.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff J. Todd Kincannon, proceeding pro se, filed a civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple defendants (unnamed/deputy sheriff, EMS employee, Lexington Medical Center employee) and entities (State of South Carolina, Lexington County, Lexington Medical Center).
  • Claims included municipal liability theories (citing Monell) and alleged actionable conduct by county and medical center employees/officials.
  • The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) on June 5, 2018, recommending dismissal without prejudice.
  • Kincannon did not file any objections to the R&R within the time allowed.
  • The district court reviewed the R&R, found no clear error on the face of the record, adopted the R&R, and entered an order dismissing the action without prejudice on June 27, 2018.
  • The order notifies the parties of the right to appeal within thirty days under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the case should proceed after the Magistrate Judge's R&R recommending dismissal Kincannon filed no objections to the R&R Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal; defendants implicitly supported R&R Court adopted the R&R and dismissed the action without prejudice because no timely objections were filed and no clear error appeared
Effect of plaintiff's failure to object to the R&R on appellate review No objection was made Failure to object waives de novo district review and appellate review Court applied the rule that absent timely objection it need not conduct de novo review and noted waiver of appellate review

Key Cases Cited

  • Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976) (magistrate judge's recommendation is advisory; district court makes the final determination)
  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005) (in absence of timely objection, district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record)
  • Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985) (failure to object to a magistrate judge's report waives appellate review)
  • Monell v. Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (municipal liability under § 1983)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kincannon v. Doe
Court Name: District Court, D. South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 27, 2018
Citations: 436 U.S. 658; 3:18-cv-00821
Docket Number: 3:18-cv-00821
Court Abbreviation: D.S.C.
Log In
    Kincannon v. Doe, 436 U.S. 658