History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kimberley Kennebrew v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
49A02-1701-CR-1
| Ind. Ct. App. | Oct 2, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Kimberley Kennebrew was charged with two counts of Class A misdemeanor battery and convicted by jury on December 12, 2016.
  • The trial court initially imposed a 365-day sentence and $183 in court costs. On December 15, 2016, the court found Kennebrew indigent for court costs and probation fees.
  • On March 7, 2017, at a restitution hearing the court issued an amended sentencing order merging Count II into Count I.
  • The amended order (entered after the restitution hearing) added a $50 public defender fee, although the fee was never discussed at any hearing and no finding supporting the fee was made on the record.
  • Kennebrew appealed; the State concedes the fee was improperly imposed without a hearing and the Court of Appeals reversed the fee imposition and remanded for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly imposed a $50 public defender fee post-conviction without a hearing or on-record findings State does not defend fee; concedes abuse of discretion Kennebrew argues fee was imposed without statutory procedure or hearing and must be vacated Court: Imposition without a hearing is an abuse of discretion; reverse the fee and remand for statutory-compliant proceedings
Appropriate remedy for an improperly imposed public defender fee (vacate vs. remand) State requests remand for further proceedings to determine if fee can be justified Kennebrew asks the court to simply vacate the fee Court adopts remand approach (follow Jackson): reverse in part and remand with instructions to observe statutory requirements if fee is to be imposed

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. State, 968 N.E.2d 328 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (remand required where public defender fee imposed without statutory procedure)
  • Kimbrough v. State, 911 N.E.2d 621 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (standard for reviewing imposition of fees is abuse of discretion)
  • Langdon v. State, 71 N.E.3d 1162 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017) (describing statutory bases for public defender fees)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kimberley Kennebrew v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 2, 2017
Docket Number: 49A02-1701-CR-1
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.