History
  • No items yet
midpage
904 F.3d 129
2d Cir.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Khalid, an LPR who entered the U.S. in 2007, was arrested in July 2011 at age 17 on federal terrorism-related charges and held in federal pretrial juvenile detention (Berks).
  • Khalid's father naturalized on August 17, 2011, while Khalid remained detained and was still under 18; Khalid turned 18 the following month and later was transferred to an adult facility.
  • Khalid cooperated extensively with prosecutors, pleaded guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 2339A, was sentenced to five years, and after serving his sentence was placed in ICE custody and served with removal proceedings based on his conviction.
  • Khalid moved to terminate removal, claiming he became a U.S. citizen under 8 U.S.C. § 1431(a) because he was in his father’s “legal and physical custody” when the father naturalized; the IJ and BIA denied the claim, holding he was not in physical custody because he was not actually residing with his father.
  • The Second Circuit granted review and held that brief, temporary federal pretrial juvenile detention did not terminate the father’s "physical custody" for § 1431(a) purposes; it vacated the BIA and ordered termination of removal proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Khalid was in "physical custody" of his father under 8 U.S.C. § 1431(a) when father naturalized Khalid: "physical custody" is a legal parent–child custody relationship and does not end because of a brief, temporary detention DHS/BIA: "physical custody" requires the child to be actually residing with the citizen parent at the time of naturalization (or before turning 18) Court: Temporary pretrial juvenile detention did not terminate the father’s physical custody; Khalid acquired derivative citizenship
Proper interpretive sources for "physical custody" in § 1431(a) Khalid: use family-law meaning and state-law definitions to inform "physical custody" as a term of art DHS: apply federal standard and BIA precedent emphasizing actual residence Court: consults state family-law definitions, statutory history, and federal canons; federal standard informed by state-law usage and CCA purpose
Whether statutory history (Child Citizenship Act) supports narrowing or broad reading of "physical custody" Khalid: CCA liberalized derivative citizenship and intended to preserve family unity; custody requirement ensures connection to naturalizing parent but should not be read narrowly to exclude temporary separations DHS: custody phrase limits derivative citizenship to children actually residing with naturalizing parent Court: CCA intended to ensure real connection but also to liberalize; reading that excludes brief separations conflicts with statute’s remedial purpose
Whether federal juvenile pretrial detention statutes negate parental custody for § 1431(a) Khalid: JDPA and related provisions promote parental involvement and favor preserving custody despite detention DHS: detention places child in governmental custody and severs physical custody Court: JDPA shows Congress favors family involvement in juvenile detention and that mere pretrial detention should not automatically sever parental physical custody

Key Cases Cited

  • Garcia v. USICE (Dep't of Homeland Sec.), 669 F.3d 91 (2d Cir.) (use of state law to construe custody in derivative-citizenship context)
  • Duarte-Ceri v. Holder, 630 F.3d 83 (2d Cir.) (CCA construed to preserve family unity and ensure child’s connection to naturalizing parent)
  • Nehme v. INS, 252 F.3d 415 (5th Cir.) (legislative history: derivative naturalization aimed to ensure real interests in the U.S.)
  • Holyfield v. Mathews, 490 U.S. 30 (Sup. Ct.) (federal definitions may draw on general state-law principles)
  • Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (Sup. Ct.) (statutory terms read in context of overall scheme)
  • Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42 (Sup. Ct.) (agency action must rest on non-arbitrary, relevant factors)
  • Berenyi v. Dist. Dir., INS, 385 U.S. 630 (Sup. Ct.) (evidentiary presumptions in immigration proceedings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Khalid v. Sessions
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Sep 13, 2018
Citations: 904 F.3d 129; 16-3480
Docket Number: 16-3480
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In
    Khalid v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 129