Kevin Boston v. State of Mississippi
2016-KA-00047-SCT
| Miss. | Sep 7, 2017Background
- On May 13, 2014, Kevin Boston and victim Willie Dean had a confrontation at Trigg Elementary; Dean later was fatally stabbed and died at the hospital.
- Boston acknowledged carrying a pocketknife (purchased about a month earlier) and claimed he stabbed Dean in self-defense after being attacked with pliers; no pliers were recovered and no eyewitness saw the stabbing.
- School surveillance captured aftermath but not the altercation; some witnesses described heated words, and one witness reported Dean said Boston stabbed him for no reason.
- Boston was indicted for capital murder based on the killing occurring on educational property and tried in Washington County Circuit Court; a jury convicted him and he was sentenced.
- On appeal, Boston’s counsel raised sufficiency/weight and denial of a self-defense instruction; Boston filed a pro se supplemental brief challenging the trial court’s grant of the State’s “pre-arming” jury instruction.
- The Mississippi Supreme Court found the pre-arming instruction was granted without evidentiary support and reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether granting the State’s pre-arming instruction was proper | State: Boston retrieved the knife from his pocket during the encounter, supporting the instruction | Boston: No evidence he armed himself in advance or intended to provoke a fight; instruction precludes self-defense | Reversed — instruction lacked evidentiary support and impermissibly curtailed Boston’s self-defense theory |
| Sufficiency/weight of evidence to convict | State: evidence supports guilt (circumstantial witness statements, conduct after stabbing) | Boston: argued self-defense and disputed witness accounts | Not reached as dispositive issue was instruction (other claims preserved for retrial) |
| Denial of one proposed self-defense jury instruction | Boston: trial court erred in refusing specific self-defense instruction | State: court’s jury package adequate | Not decided on appeal due to resolution on pre-arming instruction |
| Motion for directed verdict at close of State’s case | Boston: insufficient evidence warranted directed verdict | State: presented prima facie case | Not reached because case remanded for new trial |
Key Cases Cited
- Dew v. State, 748 So. 2d 751 (Miss. 1999) (rejects pre-arming instruction as causing manifest injustice)
- Johnson v. State, 908 So. 2d 758 (Miss. 2005) (pre-arming instruction cuts off jury consideration of self-defense)
- Keys v. State, 635 So. 2d 845 (Miss. 1994) (condemns instructions that preclude assertion of self-defense)
- Hart v. State, 637 So. 2d 1329 (Miss. 1994) (upheld pre-arming instruction where defendant’s uncontradicted testimony showed deliberate arming and intent to provoke)
- Hall v. State, 420 So. 2d 1381 (Miss. 1982) (upheld instruction where record uncontradicted that defendant armed himself and drove to confront victim)
- Reid v. State, 301 So. 2d 561 (Miss. 1974) (upheld instruction where defendant’s testimony showed deliberate arming and immediate challenge)
