History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kentucky New Era, Inc. v. City of Hopkinsville
2013 Ky. LEXIS 644
| Ky. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • New Era requested Hopkinsville PD records from Jan 1 to Aug 31, 2009 relating to stalking/harassment/terroristic threats.
  • City Clerk released redacted records, withholding juveniles and open cases and redacting personal data (SSN, DL, phones, addresses).
  • Circuit court reviewed in camera and upheld redactions of social security numbers, driver’s licenses, home addresses, and phone numbers.
  • Court of Appeals affirmed, allowing redaction of juveniles’ names and identifying information; declined to address KRS 610.320 as a blanket rule.
  • New Era sought AG review; AG agreed against blanket disclosures and favored narrow privacy redactions; City sued under KRS 61.882.
  • This Court affirms the Court of Appeals, upholding the privacy exemption and the City’s categorical redaction policy.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the privacy exemption allow withholding private identifiers? New Era: exemptions must be narrowly applied, not blanket. Hopkinsville: privacy interests justify redacting private identifiers. Yes; privacy exemption supports redactions.
Is the City’s categorical redaction policy compliant with the Act’s strict construction? New Era: blanket redactions violate case-by-case requirement. Hopkinsville: categorically redacting routine private data is permissible. Yes; categorical redaction approved as reasonable.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States Department of State v. The Washington Post Company, 456 U.S. 595 (U.S. 1982) (privacy interest in government records; Exemption 6 framework)
  • Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Federal Aviation Administration, 489 U.S. 749 (U.S. 1989) (categorical vs. ad hoc exemptions; privacy standard)
  • Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (U.S. 2004) (privacy interests in law enforcement records; qualitative impact on public interest)
  • Cape Publications v. City of Louisville, 147 S.W.3d 731 (Ky.App. 2003) (victims’ privacy in sexual-offense reports; redaction upheld)
  • Bd. of Examiners in Psychology v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co., 826 S.W.2d 324 (Ky. 1992) (privacy vs. disclosure; open records balancing)
  • Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Department of Justice, 489 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (FOIA privacy exemptions; categorical balancing principles endorsed)
  • Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. NLRB, 437 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1978) (categorical redaction approach in FOIA context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kentucky New Era, Inc. v. City of Hopkinsville
Court Name: Kentucky Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ky. LEXIS 644
Docket Number: No. 2012-SC-000290-DG
Court Abbreviation: Ky.