History
  • No items yet
midpage
82 So. 3d 655
Ala.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Lawrence operates Montgomery Memorial Cemetery; Lawrence purchased it from Alderwoods in 2002.
  • Ben Jakeman bought a 10-space family plot in 1967; burial within the plot was limited to Jakeman or O'Neal family members.
  • MMC allegedly conveyed two spaces in Ben's plot to James A. Jones and Judy A. Jones in 2002; James was interred there after his death.
  • Kenneth learned in 2006 of the burial; MMC disinterred James and moved his body and marker, but reburied him in another space on Ben's plot.
  • Kenneth sued in 2010 for various tortious and contractual claims; Judy cross-claimed against Alderwoods, Lawrence, and MMC.
  • The trial court dismissed all Kenneth claims; Judy moved postjudgment; an amended order left Judy's cross-claim pending.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the appeal is from a final judgment Jakeman argues the case was disposed of all claims. Alderwoods/Lawrence/MMC contend Judy's cross-claim remained pending, so judgment was not final. Appeal dismissed for lack of finality.
Whether Judy's cross-claim pending below prevents final judgment Jakeman notes cross-claim status is irrelevant to finality of Kenneth's claims. Cross-claim remained, so judgment could not be final as to all claims. Amended judgment was nonfinal; not a proper final judgment for appeal.
Whether Rule 54(b) certification was required Kenneth argues the court disposed of all claims as to all parties. No Rule 54(b) certification; judgment not final as to Judy's cross-claim. No Rule 54(b) certification; judgment not final for appeal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bon Harbor, LLC v. United Bank, 20 So. 3d 1263 (Ala. 2009) (subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived by arguments)
  • Riley v. Hughes, 17 So. 3d 643 (Ala. 2009) (jurisdictional analysis independent of party arguments)
  • Rollins v. Rollins, 903 So. 2d 828 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004) (premature postjudgment motions may quicken on final judgment date)
  • New Addition Club, Inc. v. Vaughn, 903 So. 2d 68 (Ala. 2004) (timing of postjudgment motions and tolling rules)
  • T.T.T. v. R.H., 999 So. 2d 544 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) (treat premature postjudgment motion as timely from final judgment date)
  • Dickerson v. Alabama State Univ., 852 So. 2d 704 (Ala. 2002) (final judgments dispose of all claims unless Rule 54(b) certification)
  • Crutcher v. Williams, 12 So. 3d 631 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) (an order left unresolved as to cross-claims is nonfinal)
  • Faulk v. Rhodes, 43 So. 3d 624 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010) (judgment failing to adjudicate all pending claims lacks finality)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kenneth JAKEMAN v. LAWRENCE GROUP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 7, 2011
Citations: 82 So. 3d 655; 2011 Ala. LEXIS 176; 2011 WL 4790618; 1100290
Docket Number: 1100290
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In