History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kenerly v. State
325 Ga. App. 412
Ga. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Kenerly, a former Gwinnett County Commissioner, was first indicted Oct 11, 2010; a special-purpose grand jury later held the first indictment improper for criminal jurisdiction over indictments.
  • After the first indictment, Kenerly appealed; this court ultimately held special-purpose grand juries cannot return indictments, and remittitur followed.
  • Before remittitur, on Aug 4, 2011, the State obtained a second indictment from a regularly impaneled grand jury charging the same three counts as the first (bribery and two counts of failure to disclose financial interest).
  • Kenerly moved to quash the second indictment, arguing pendency of the first appeal divested trial court jurisdiction and that the second indictment violated the statute of limitations.
  • Kenerly also moved for a plea in bar challenging the second indictment on statute-of-limitations grounds, with stipulations showing discovery and facts spanning 2003–2010 related to alleged corrupt payments.
  • The trial court denied both the motion to quash and the plea in bar; the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s rulings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether pending appeal divests trial court of jurisdiction to accept second indictment Kenerly—pending appeal divests jurisdiction and second indictment is invalid State—second indictment is a separate prosecution not affected by the first appeal No; jurisdiction not divested; second indictment proper as separate prosecution
Whether bribery charge is timely under statute of limitations Kenerly—tolled by unknown crime until Feb 2010; not tolled State—tolling applies; discovery in Feb 2010 timely Tolling applies; bribery commenced within four years after discovery (Feb 2010)
Whether disclosure of financial interest charge is timely under statute of limitations Kenerly—no tolling; earlier knowledge imputable to State State—tolling applies until Feb 2010 Tolling applies; prosecution commenced within two years after discovery (Feb 2010)

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. State, 322 Ga. App. 446 (Ga. App. 2013) (pendency of appeal did not deprive trial court of jurisdiction to issue second indictment)
  • Roberts v. State, 296 Ga. App. 437 (Ga. App. 2009) (lost jurisdiction analyzed with issues on appeal; second indictment may proceed if independent of the first)
  • Porter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 121 (Ga. App. 2011) (limits on trial court actions during pendency of appeal; jurisdictional boundaries)
  • Jenkins v. State, 278 Ga. 598 (Ga. 2004) (knowledge of identity; tolling considerations under statute of limitations)
  • Royal v. State, 14 Ga. App. 20 (Ga. App. 2012) ( tolling when act is unknown; public-domain knowledge insufficient)
  • State v. Robins, 296 Ga. App. 437 (Ga. App. 2009) (lack of knowledge of illegality not tolled; actual act knowledge required)
  • Beasley v. State, 244 Ga. App. 836 (Ga. App. 2000) (discussion of tolling and reasonable-diligence considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kenerly v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 22, 2013
Citation: 325 Ga. App. 412
Docket Number: A13A1370
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.