midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2018 Ohio 3141
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Susan and Michael Keller divorced by agreed decree on July 31, 2015 after a 32‑year marriage; the decree required equal division of all retirement/employment benefits and directed use of QDRO(s) for qualified plans.
  • Exhibit D to the decree listed several accounts and noted that qualified pension amounts would be divided pursuant to a QDRO and that non‑qualified portions would be split on an “if, as, and when” basis, with taxes deducted.
  • The parties later filed an agreed judgment entry reiterating equal division of retirement benefits; no specific valuation date for pension division was specified in the decree or subsequent agreement.
  • A dispute arose over whether the Nationwide and IBM pension interests should be divided as of the divorce date (July 31, 2015) using a frozen coverture fraction or at the spouse’s future retirement date (traditional coverture method).
  • The trial court held the pensions must be divided effective as of the termination of the marriage (July 31, 2015) and that the wife’s 50% share should be determined using a frozen coverture fraction; the court issued QDROs accordingly.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Proper valuation date for division of IBM and Nationwide pension plans Keller (wife) argued QDRO should follow plain decree language and divide benefits equally at appellee’s future retirement (use retirement date) Michael (husband) argued division should be effective as of the divorce date (terminate marriage date) Court held the decree unambiguously required equal division effective at termination of marriage (July 31, 2015)
Appropriate valuation method (frozen coverture vs. traditional coverture) Keller argued benefits should be calculated at retirement value (traditional coverture) Michael argued frozen coverture as of divorce date is required by decree language Court held frozen coverture method required because decree awarded half the pension as of the divorce date

Key Cases Cited

  • (No key authorities with official reporter citations were provided in the opinion that meet the requirement to list only officially reported cases.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Keller v. Keller
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 7, 2018
Citations: 2018 Ohio 3141; 18 CAF 01 0008, 18 CAF 01 0009, 18 CAF 01 0010
Docket Number: 18 CAF 01 0008, 18 CAF 01 0009, 18 CAF 01 0010
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In