History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keisha W. v. Marvin M. CA1/5
177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 161
Cal. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother sought a restraining order Aug 6, 2012 and custody relief; order issued Aug 31, 2012 granting Mother physical custody and asserting UCCJEA jurisdiction.
  • Father abducted the Minor to Nevada on May 31, 2012 after living in Texas; Texas custody order provided shared custody and later indicated it lacked ongoing jurisdiction.
  • Mother moved to California with the Minor in Aug 2011; California asserted jurisdiction under UCCJEA to modify the Texas custody determination.
  • A137991: California court held jurisdiction under UCCJEA to modify Texas order; restraining order served Sep 20, 2012 in Nevada.
  • A137861: Jan 30, 2013 UCCJEA conference: Texas declined, Nevada neutral, California accepted jurisdiction; appealability of that order at issue; court dismissed the appeal for lack of an appealable order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did CA have jurisdiction to modify the Texas custody order? Mother: CA home state, CA home state rule supports modification under 3423. Father: CA lacked authority to modify under UCCJEA. Yes; CA had jurisdiction under 3423 to modify.
Is the August 31, 2012 restraining-order appeal timely? Mother argues timely under 180-day window from entry. Father contends timeliness per rule 8.104(a). Timely; 180 days from entry.
Was the January 30, 2013 acceptance of jurisdiction appealable collateral order? Father argues collateral order doctrine applies to jurisdictional determination. Father contends it was appealable. No; not an appealable collateral order; dismissal proper.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Fernandez-Abin & Sanchez, 191 Cal.App.4th 1015 (2011) (UCCJEA applies to custody and DV protective orders; home state analysis)
  • Brewer v. Carter, 218 Cal.App.4th 1312 (2013) (home state within six months alternative basis for jurisdiction)
  • In re Nelson B., 215 Cal.App.4th 1121 (2013) (arguments forfeited if not timely raised)
  • Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424 (1985) (collateral order doctrine scope)
  • In re Marriage of Nurie, 176 Cal.App.4th 478 (2009) (conduct by parents affecting jurisdiction under UCCJEA)
  • In re Marriage of Battenburg, 28 Cal.App.4th 1338 (1994) (finality requirement for collateral-order analysis)
  • Badie v. Bank of America, 67 Cal.App.4th 779 (1998) (standards for appellate briefing and argument)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Keisha W. v. Marvin M. CA1/5
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Aug 7, 2014
Citation: 177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 161
Docket Number: A137861, A137991
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.