History
  • No items yet
midpage
KBG Investments, LLC v. Greenspoint Property Owners' Association, Inc.
2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 10198
| Tex. App. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • KBG Investments, LLC owns a commercial tract in Greenspoint subject to a Declaration; Greenspoint Property Owners’ Association enforces the Covenant.
  • KBG sought and obtained Architectural Review Committee approval to paint and to post two designated signs but actually painted an unapproved bright yellow and erected four unapproved signs at non-approved locations.
  • Greenspoint sued for permanent injunctive relief, declaratory relief on its lien securing fees, and statutory damages under Texas Property Code § 202.004(c).
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for injunctive relief and awarded $10,400 in statutory damages plus attorney’s fees, costs, and interest.
  • On appeal, KBG challenged summary judgment and the statutory-damages award; the court affirmed as modified, eliminating statutory damages but preserving injunctive relief.
  • The court held that § 202.004(c) damages are exemplary damages subject to Chapter 41, which requires proof of actual damages beyond nominal damages; since Greenspoint showed no actual damages, the statutory damages award was improper.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment on violation of the covenant KBG argued material-fact defenses (e.g., waiver/estoppel) should preclude summary judgment Greenspoint showed unapproved painting/signs; KBG failed to raise genuine issues Yes; summary judgment upheld; KBG failed to raise genuine issues precluding it
Whether statutory damages under § 202.004(c) are exemplary damages and subject to Chapter 41 Greenspoint contends damages are not subject to Chapter 41 or require actual damages Chapter 41 applies; damages require nominal or actual damages; no actual damages means no statutory damages Chapter 41 applies; § 202.004(c) damages are exemplary; award vacated due to no actual damages

Key Cases Cited

  • Sanchez v. Southampton Civic Club, Inc., 367 S.W.3d 429 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012) (civil damages under § 202.004(c) are punitive)
  • Uptegraph v. Sandalwood Civic Club, 312 S.W.3d 918 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010) (statutory damages can be punitive; lack of actual damages discussed)
  • Flores v. Millennium Interests, Ltd., 185 S.W.3d 427 (Tex. 2005) (liquidated damages provision treated as punitive; discussion on no requirement of actual harm for statutory damages)
  • Smith v. Davis, 462 S.W.3d 604 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2015) (Exemplary damages framework under Chapter 41; damages caps)
  • Nabours v. Longview Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 700 S.W.2d 901 (Tex. 1985) (necessity to prove actual damage to support punitive awards)
  • City of Lorena v. BMTP Holdings, L.P., 409 S.W.3d 634 (Tex. 2013) (statutory damages consistency across statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: KBG Investments, LLC v. Greenspoint Property Owners' Association, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 1, 2015
Citation: 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 10198
Docket Number: NO. 14-14-00484-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.