midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
540 S.W.3d 4
Tenn. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Dismissal of heirs substituted after decedent’s death; estate opened post-substitution; Rule 25.01 governs substitution with a 90-day deadline from death suggestion; excusable neglect may extend deadline under Rule 6.02; appellate court reverses and remands for proper substitution and consideration of excusable neglect; Loyd remained as appellee post-dismissal.
  • Original plaintiff Katherine Dubis died February 3, 2015; parents Maureen and Chris Dubis sought substitution as next of kin under Rule 25.01; estate later opened in Missouri.
  • Amica Mutual and Loyd opposed substitution arguing lack of valid 20-5-104 showing; trial court dismissed after finding no excusable neglect and untimely substitution.
  • Court acknowledged revival under 20-5-102 and 20-5-104 requires showing no one will administer the estate; estate opened in Missouri undermined strict 20-5-104 require.
  • Court held excusable neglect supported enlargement of time; case remanded for substitution of personal representative as plaintiff.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether dismissal was proper for lack of proper substitution under 20-5-104 Dubis heirs satisfied Rule 25.01 timing; no evidence of lack of administration Need affirmative showing no one will administer per 20-5-104 Reversed; excusable neglect supports extension and substitution error remanded
Whether excusable neglect justifies extending Rule 25.01 deadline under Rule 6.02 Counsel unaware of Missouri estate; delay minor and non-prejudicial Delay due to inattention and control not shown Reversed; excusable neglect established; remand for proper substitution

Key Cases Cited

  • Preston v. Golde, 80 Tenn. 267 (1883) (revivor requires no administrator; burden to show no admin exists)
  • McDonald v. City of Nashville, 114 Tenn. 540, 86 S.W. 317 (1905) ( heirs may be substituted only after proper revivor against administrator)
  • McDaniel v. Mulvihill, 196 Tenn. 41, 263 S.W.2d 759 (1953) (abrogated common-law rule; statutory revival applied)
  • Williams v. Baptist Mem’l Hosp., 193 S.W.3d 545 (2006) (excusable neglect framework; factors for enlargement of time)
  • Kenyon v. Handal, 122 S.W.3d 743 (2003) (excusable neglect broad; factors including control and diligence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Katherine C. Dubis v. Yolanda E. Loyd
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Date Published: Aug 15, 2016
Citations: 540 S.W.3d 4; W2015-02192-COA-R3-CV
Docket Number: W2015-02192-COA-R3-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tenn. Ct. App.
Log In
    Katherine C. Dubis v. Yolanda E. Loyd, 540 S.W.3d 4