History
  • No items yet
midpage
Karst Environmental Education & Protection, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration
559 F. App'x 421
6th Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Karst Environmental appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for FHWA under the APA for NEPA noncompliance regarding the I-65 to U.S. 31 West connector in Warren County, Kentucky.
  • NEPA requires agencies to prepare an EIS and consider significant environmental impacts before actions that significantly affect the environment; the district court found no preserved 100-year floodplain issue.
  • The project area sits on the Pennyroyal Sinkhole Plain with karst features, sinkholes, subterranean drainage, and potential flood mechanisms related to sinkhole flooding and the Barren River.
  • FHWA published a May 2007 draft EIS, finalized and published the final EIS after public comments, identifying Alternative 6-Orange as preferred; FHWA issued its final decision on April 15, 2010.
  • FHWA asserted FEMA flood maps showed no 100-year floodplains in the project area; Karst asserted the record showed sinkhole flooding considerations and related floodplain analyses.
  • The district court held Karst did not raise the issue with sufficient clarity during the administrative process, and the court’s decision was that Karst forfeited the claim; the appeal challenges this forfeiture ruling.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Karst forfeited the 100-year floodplain claim by not raising it adequately in the administrative process. Karst contends FHWA ignored record evidence of sinkhole flooding and 100-year floodplain impacts; the administrative record shows notice. Karst failed to raise the issue with sufficient clarity during comment periods; the agency could not address or correct the issue. Affirmed on forfeiture grounds.

Key Cases Cited

  • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court 1978) (requires a meaningful opportunity to participate; detailed pleading not required in all contexts)
  • Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court 1983) (NEPA requires considering significant environmental impacts and a hard look at consequences)
  • Kleppe v. Sierra Club, 427 U.S. 390 (Supreme Court 1976) (NEPA review includes ensuring agency takes a hard look at effects)
  • Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Beshear v. Alexander, 655 F.2d 714 (6th Cir. 1981) (administrative challenges must be raised during the process; timely notice matters)
  • Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, 495 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir. 2007) (claims must be raised with sufficient clarity to alert agency)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Karst Environmental Education & Protection, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 12, 2014
Citation: 559 F. App'x 421
Docket Number: 12-5008
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.