History
  • No items yet
midpage
341 P.3d 377
Wyo.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Parents divorced in 2010; mother (Darla) awarded primary physical and legal custody of GK; father (Jim) given standard visitation.
  • In Jan 2018 mother was convicted of petty larceny for stealing a coworker’s cell phone and lost her long‑time job; she remained financially solvent due to savings and later married Garrett Kato.
  • Mother moved GK from Lingle, WY to Denver without prior notice to father; father filed to modify custody while GK was with him for summer visitation and obtained temporary custody pending a merits hearing.
  • District court found a material change in circumstances (mother’s job loss/conviction, dating history, remarriage, and moves) and modified custody, awarding primary custody to father; mother appealed.
  • Supreme Court majority reversed, holding father failed to prove a material change affecting GK’s welfare; two justices dissented arguing the court should have deferred to the district court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Father) Defendant's Argument (Mother) Held
Whether a material change in circumstances occurred to reopen custody Mother’s relocation, job loss, conviction, dating, remarriage, and moves show instability that affects GK’s welfare Relocation and other events did not materially affect GK’s welfare; mother remained able to provide and many changes were neutral/beneficial Reversed — father failed to show a material change affecting the child’s welfare; district court abused discretion

Key Cases Cited

  • Arnott v. Arnott, 293 P.3d 440 (Wyo. 2012) (relocation by custodial parent is not presumptively a material change; adopt multi‑factor test)
  • In re TLJ, 129 P.3d 874 (Wyo. 2006) (material‑change threshold before best‑interest factors; abuse‑of‑discretion review)
  • Jackson v. Jackson, 96 P.3d 21 (Wyo. 2004) (burden on moving party to show material change and best interests; caution against frequent custody changes)
  • Reavis v. Reavis, 955 P.2d 428 (Wyo. 1998) (stability in child’s environment is paramount)
  • Kreuter v. Kreuter, 728 P.2d 1129 (Wyo. 1986) (res judicata considerations and material‑change threshold)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kappen v. Kappen
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 7, 2015
Citations: 341 P.3d 377; 2015 WL 93448; 2015 Wyo. LEXIS 4; 2015 WY 3; S-14-0092
Docket Number: S-14-0092
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Kappen v. Kappen, 341 P.3d 377