History
  • No items yet
midpage
KAMINSKI v. MYDATT SERVICES, INC.
2:12-cv-00363
W.D. Pa.
Jun 8, 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Kaminski sued Ross Township in Western District of Pennsylvania over events at Ross Park Mall on November 26, 2010.
  • Lattera, a Mydatt employee, directed traffic and allegedly struck the Kaminski car; he falsely claimed he was struck by plaintiffs’ car.
  • Lattera assaulted John Kaminski, and Serowik arrived and tased John Kaminski during the incident.
  • Lattera later faced criminal charges for false imprisonment, simple assault, unlawful restraint, harassment, impersonating a public servant, and filing a false report.
  • Plaintiffs allege §1983 claims (Count VII) and negligent training/supervision (Count VIII) against Ross Township; the Township moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).
  • The court grants the motion to dismiss, finding no plausible §1983 claim and immunity for negligent training/supervision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
§1983 supervision liability Kaminski asserts a municipal policy or custom caused the violation. Ross Township policy of allowing officers to work security is insufficient to causally connect to the violation. Policy lacked causal link; no §1983 claim.
Failure to train §1983 claim Amended complaint shows deliberate indifference to rights via training. No facts showing deliberate indifference; merely bad judgment by Serowik. No sufficient facts to support deliberate indifference; §1983 failure to train not stated.
Negligent training and supervision claims immunity Count VIII seeks negligence-based claims against the Township responsible for training and supervision. Count VIII falls under negligent training and supervision with potential liability. Ross Township immune; sovereign immunity bars negligent training/supervision claims.

Key Cases Cited

  • Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (pleading standard requires plausible claims)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (plausibility pleading standard clarified)
  • Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009) (three-step approach to pleading sufficiency)
  • Malleus v. George, 641 F.3d 560 (3d Cir. 2011) (application of Iqbal/Fowler framework)
  • Woods v. Grant, 381 F. App’x 144 (3d Cir. 2010) (pleading §1983 claims against municipalities)
  • Kranson v. Valley Crest Nursing Home, 755 F.2d 46 (3d Cir. 1985) (elements for municipal liability require policy and causation)
  • Reitz v. County of Bucks, 125 F.3d 139 (3d Cir. 1997) (deliberate indifference standard for training claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: KAMINSKI v. MYDATT SERVICES, INC.
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 8, 2012
Docket Number: 2:12-cv-00363
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Pa.