History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kallis v. Sones
146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 419
Cal. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Line tree straddled the property line between the Kallises and Soneses; both parties own coterminous lots in Los Angeles.
  • In 2008, Soneses cut down the tree at issue, cutting both trunk portions, leaving a large stump.
  • Post-cut, a survey showed 41% of the stump on the Kallises’ land and 59% on the Soneses’ land.
  • Plaintiffs sued for wrongful cutting, trespass, and negligence; damages issues proceeded to bench trial.
  • Trial court awarded $53,628.31 in damages (before doubling); after Civil Code 3346(a) doubling, total was $107,256.62.
  • Court allowed restoration damages based on the tree’s personal value and likelihood plaintiffs would restore a similar tree.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether damages should be reduced for partial trunk ownership Soneses argue proportional reduction based on trunk on Kallises’ land. Soneses contend damages must reflect proportionate trunk ownership. No reduction; court could consider personal value and restoration.
Whether double damages apply to full damages including installation/aftercare Double damages apply only to tree value, not installation/aftercare. Double damages should extend to full measured detriment including installation/aftercare. Full amount (including installation/aftercare) was properly doubled.

Key Cases Cited

  • Scarborough v. Woodill, 7 Cal.App.3d 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907) (line trees belong to owners in common; cannot cut shared portion)
  • Heninger v. Dunn, 101 Cal.App.3d 858 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980) (restoration/value measures for tree damages; extensive discussion)
  • Toscano v. Greene Music, 124 Cal.App.4th 685 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) (discretion in determining damages amount in restoration context)
  • SCI California Funeral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges Foundation, 203 Cal.App.4th 549 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (discretion in choosing measure of damages for complex cases)
  • GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc., 224 Cal.App.3d 856 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (business damages; multiple permissible measures of damages)
  • Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLC, 173 P.3d 959 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007) (measure of damages for trees on property line; proportional trunk method discussed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kallis v. Sones
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Aug 6, 2012
Citation: 146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 419
Docket Number: No. B228912
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.