History
  • No items yet
midpage
775 F. Supp. 2d 1374
S.D. Fla.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Dorian Kallen, a wheelchair user, sues J.R. Eight, Inc. for ADA violations at Johnny Rockets restaurant.
  • Amended complaint alleges 17 ADAAG violations and seeks declaratory, injunctive relief and fees.
  • Court held an evidentiary preliminary injunction; found insufficient for injunction relief.
  • Defendant asserts barriers were remedied; attached ADA compliance evidence before Amended Complaint.
  • Court previously ruled the restaurant in ADA compliance and that some claims are moot or fail to state a claim.
  • Final order grants dismissal with prejudice and sanctions, with fee-shifting to plaintiff if applicable.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Mootness vs. live controversy for remediated barriers Kallen's claims remain live until barriers are permanently fixed Remedied barriers render claims moot Claims moot as to remedied barriers; no relief remaining
Standing to sue based on alleged barriers Kallen visited restaurant and encountered barriers Plaintiff failed to prove visitation or cognizable injury Court lacked standing; moot or fail to state claim even if visited
Existence of remaining ADA violations Eight barriers still exist Barriers cured; no discriminatory impact Eight alleged barriers do not constitute ADA violations; facility ADA-compliant
Entitlement to attorneys’ fees and costs Plaintiff entitled to fees as catalyst Remedial action by defendant negates prevailing-party status Plaintiff not prevailing; defendant awarded fees; sanctions allowed

Key Cases Cited

  • Access 4 All, Inc. v. Casa Marina Owner, LLC, 458 F.Supp.2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (remedial plans moot claims; fee denial for non-prevailing plaintiff)
  • Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Key Largo Bay Beach, LLC, 407 F.Supp.2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (courts recognize safety and access requirements; remedial measures may moot claims)
  • Troiano v. Supervisor of Elections in Palm Beach County, Fla., 382 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2004) (mootness principle; lack of ongoing controversy defeats jurisdiction)
  • Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (S. Ct. 2001) (catalyst theory rejected; prevailing party status required for fees)
  • Casa Marina Owner, LLC, 458 F.Supp.2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (remedial plan shown; claim moot; diligence required; fees denied)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kallen v. J.R. Eight, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Florida
Date Published: Mar 31, 2011
Citations: 775 F. Supp. 2d 1374; 2011 WL 1237864; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36681; Case 10-23704-CIV
Docket Number: Case 10-23704-CIV
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Fla.
Log In
    Kallen v. J.R. Eight, Inc., 775 F. Supp. 2d 1374