History
  • No items yet
midpage
Junious P. Bartlett v. City of Newport News Department of Human Services
0524161
Va. Ct. App.
Dec 20, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • DHS filed emergency removal petitions and later permanency and termination petitions for two children in JDR court; petitions were signed by nonlawyer DHS employees (social workers).
  • JDR court entered removal, dispositional, permanency, and termination orders; appellants (parents) appealed to the circuit court.
  • Appellants moved to dismiss in circuit court, arguing pleadings signed by nonattorney DHS employees constituted unauthorized practice of law and deprived the courts of active jurisdiction.
  • Circuit court denied the motions and affirmed the JDR orders; appeals to the Court of Appeals of Virginia were consolidated.
  • The Court of Appeals analyzed statutory amendments and an Attorney General opinion, concluding the legislature intended to permit designated nonattorney local DSS employees to sign certain Supreme Court–approved form petitions.
  • Court affirmed: form petitions signed by DHS employees were valid and did not divest the juvenile court or circuit court of jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether form petitions signed by nonattorney DHS employees constituted unauthorized practice of law and voided jurisdiction Rudolph/Bartlett: Nonlawyer signatures render pleadings nullities and deprive courts of active jurisdiction DHS: Statutory scheme, AG opinion, and legislative amendments authorize designated nonattorney employees to sign approved form petitions Held: Nonattorney DHS employees may sign Supreme Court–approved form petitions; pleadings were valid and courts retained jurisdiction

Key Cases Cited

  • Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va. App. 119 (appellate review of legal questions) (review standard referenced)
  • Beck v. Shelton, 267 Va. 482 (Attorney General opinions entitled to due consideration)
  • Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 157 (legislative acquiescence to AG interpretations)
  • Aguilera v. Christian, 280 Va. 486 (nullity rule for pleadings signed by nonlawyers; statutory exception recognized)
  • Patterson v. Commonwealth, 62 Va. App. 488 (statutes must be construed to effect legislative intent)
  • Saunders v. Commonwealth, 56 Va. App. 139 (statutory interpretation principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Junious P. Bartlett v. City of Newport News Department of Human Services
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Dec 20, 2016
Docket Number: 0524161
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.