Julie Mikolajczak v. Balbir Mann d/b/a Cole's Corner Market
34824-5
| Wash. Ct. App. | Dec 7, 2017Background
- Balbir Mann operates Cole's Corner Market as a sole proprietorship and also owns 90% of Mann Group LLC (Sultan Chevron); Mann manages both businesses.
- Cole's Corner employed no more than seven people during the relevant period; Mann Group LLC had additional employees.
- Julie Zufall (f/k/a Mikolajczak) worked for Cole's Corner in 2013, suffered a shoulder injury, and alleges Mann failed to provide a reasonable accommodation in violation of the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD).
- WLAD applies only to "employers" who employ eight or more persons; the Human Rights Commission rule WAC 162-16-220(6) allows combining employees of corporations or other artificial persons if managed in common.
- The trial court held Mann qualified as an employer by combining employees of Cole's Corner and Mann Group LLC under WAC 162-16-220(6); Mann appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether WAC 162-16-220(6) permits combining employees of a sole proprietorship with those of a corporation/other artificial person to meet WLAD's eight-employee threshold | Zufall: Yes — Cole's Corner employees may be combined with Mann Group LLC employees because the entities are managed in common | Mann: No — a sole proprietorship is not a corporation or "artificial person," so the rule does not apply; only employees personally attributable to Mann count | Reversed the trial court: WAC 162-16-220(6) applies only to corporations/other artificial persons; a sole proprietorship cannot be combined with such entities to reach eight employees |
Key Cases Cited
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., 162 Wn.2d 340 (interpreting agency rules using plain meaning)
- Trs. of Dartmouth Coll. v. Woodward, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518 (defining a corporation as an artificial being)
- Bankston v. Pierce County, 174 Wn. App. 932 (sole proprietorship legally indistinguishable from its owner)
- Patten v. Ackerman, 68 Wn. App. 831 (individual not personally responsible for corporation's employees)
- Anaya v. Graham, 89 Wn. App. 588 (discussing payroll method for counting employees)
