History
  • No items yet
midpage
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
396 U.S. App. D.C. 200
| D.C. Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • FHFA has been conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac since 2008.
  • Judicial Watch sought FOIA disclosure of records concerning political campaign contributions by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
  • FHFA acknowledged receipt of responsive records but stated no employee had read them.
  • District court granted summary judgment finding the documents not
  • FOIA provides access to agency records only if the agency controls them at the time of the request.
  • Court affirmed district court’s judgment that FHFA does not control the documents to make them agency records under FOIA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FHFA controls the records as conservator. Judicial Watch. FHFA controls via conservatorship. No control under Burka factors.
Whether ownership of records by FHFA makes them agency records. Ownership transfers control. Ownership does not equal control. Ownership alone not control; records not agency records.
Whether use by agency is required to make records FOIA subject. Public access to potentially informative records. No use means not agency records. Use is decisive; no use means not agency records.

Key Cases Cited

  • Burka v. U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 87 F.3d 508 (D.C.Cir.1996) (four-factor control test for agency records)
  • Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136 (Supreme Court, 1980) (private papers not FOIA records absent agency control)
  • Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136 (Supreme Court, 1989) (records must be created/obtained and controlled by agency)
  • Forsham v. Harris, 445 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1980) (documents agency has right to acquire but not yet exercised not FOIA records)
  • Consumer Federation of Am. v. Dept. of Agriculture, 455 F.3d 283 (D.C.Cir.2006) (calibrates FOIA obligations where agency has not relied on records)
  • Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1976) (FOIA aims to open agency action to public)
  • U.S. Dept. of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 1989) (core purpose of FOIA to shed light on government operations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Aug 5, 2011
Citation: 396 U.S. App. D.C. 200
Docket Number: 10-5349
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.