midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
25 F. Supp. 3d 131
D.D.C.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Navy contracted renewable energy with SunPower in fall 2011; dispute centers on FOIA request for contract-related documents.
  • Plaintiff Judicial Watch requested records regarding the SunPower contract, communications, and related lobbying firm interactions.
  • A Source Selection Authority (SSA) and a Source Selection Board (SSB) evaluated proposals and recommended SunPower; SSA ultimately entered the contract.
  • Navy produced some documents, including a December 17, 2009 Business Clearance Memorandum with signatory pages, but redacted the signatories’ names.
  • Plaintiff challenged the redactions; Navy moved for summary judgment arguing Exemptions 5 and 6; Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment; Court held issues premature and denied without prejudice to refiling.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the signatories’ names are protected by Exemption 5. Judicial Watch asserts Exemption 5 does not apply to names. NAVFAC contends the signatories’ names are deliberative and predecisional. Exemption 5 not applicable to the names.
Whether the signatories’ names are protected by Exemption 6. Names should be disclosed; no substantial privacy interest. Names constitute a substantial privacy interest. Record insufficient to determine substantial privacy interest; denial without prejudice.
Whether Exemption 5 was properly raised belatedly. Exemption 5 raised timely; should be considered. Exemption 5 raised by declaration after initial motion; not properly before court. Court addressed Exemption 5 as a precaution but allowed later refiling.

Key Cases Cited

  • Coastal States Gas Corp. v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 617 F.2d 854 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (scope of Exemption 5 protections; narrowly construed privileges)
  • NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1975) (deliberative process privilege framework)
  • U.S. Dep’t of State v. Wash. Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (U.S. 1982) (interpretation of 'similar files' under Exemption 6)
  • U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1976) (deliberative process and privacy considerations in FOIA)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: ['Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of the Navy']
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Mar 17, 2014
Citations: 25 F. Supp. 3d 131; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34145; 2014 WL 1006659; Civil Action No. 2012-0172
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0172
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
Log In