History
  • No items yet
midpage
Judicial Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO
288 Ga. 294
| Ga. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Brown & Gallo sued for declaratory judgment under OCGA § 50-13-10 challenging ethics provisions adopted by the Board of Court Reporting and reviewed by the Judicial Council of Georgia.
  • Brown & Gallo sought to stay the grievance procedure initiated by the Board regarding alleged ethics violations.
  • The Council and Board moved to dismiss, arguing sovereign immunity; they contended APA excludes the judiciary from coverage, exempting them.
  • The trial court denied dismissal, holding the APA exclusion of 'the judiciary' did not automatically include the Council/Board.
  • Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion; the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether the Council and Board are within 'the judiciary' for APA purposes.
  • The Supreme Court held that the Council and Board are part of the judiciary, thus exempt from the APA as applied to sovereign immunity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are the Council and Board within 'the judiciary' for APA purposes? Brown & Gallo contends they are not the judiciary; not covered by the APA exemption. Council and Board are agencies of the judiciary and thus fall within the exemption. Yes; they are within the judiciary, exemption applies.
Does the APA exclude the judiciary from the definition of 'agency' under OCGA § 50-13-2(1)? Brown & Gallo argues the judiciary is not an 'agency' subject to APA rules. Council/Board are judiciary bodies authorized to make rules; exempt from agency definition. Yes; the judiciary is exempt in this context.
Does separation of powers justify treating the Council and Board as part of the judiciary for APA purposes? Brown & Gallo urges a narrow reading that separates these entities from the judiciary. Constitutional separation of powers permits inherent judicial authority over matters of justice; these bodies belong to the judiciary. Yes; separation of powers supports including them in the judiciary.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thompson v. Talmadge, 201 Ga. 867, 41 S.E.2d 883 (1947) (Ga. 1947) (describes judicial power and separation of powers)
  • Lovett v. Sandersville R. Co., 199 Ga. 238, 33 S.E.2d 905 (1945) (Ga. 1945) (judicial power includes authority to discharge duties to improve justice)
  • Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102, 166 S.E.2d 718 (1969) (Ga. 1969) (judicial power includes measures necessary to protect judiciary as independent department)
  • Grimsley v. Twiggs County, 249 Ga. 632, 292 S.E.2d 675 (1982) (Ga. 1982) (judicial authority extends to functions necessary to administer justice)
  • McNair v. State, 285 Ga. 514, 678 S.E.2d 69 (2009) (Ga. 2009) (presumption of constitutionality and statutory validity in interpretation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Judicial Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 22, 2010
Citation: 288 Ga. 294
Docket Number: S10G0359
Court Abbreviation: Ga.