Joseph Peter Clarke v. United States
184 So. 3d 1107
| Fla. | 2016Background
- Jenkins and Clarke were defendants in a federal reverse-sting prosecution; Jenkins was charged under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for firearm possession by a "convicted" felon after being found with a handgun.
- Jenkins had a prior Florida guilty plea to possession of cocaine in 2008, but the Florida trial court withheld adjudication under § 948.01(2).
- 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) requires that whether a prior disposition is a "conviction" be determined by the law of the jurisdiction where the proceeding occurred (Florida).
- The Eleventh Circuit had conflicting precedent: earlier Eleventh Circuit decisions held withheld adjudication could qualify as a conviction for federal purposes, but Florida Supreme Court and Florida district courts had decisions suggesting adjudication is required.
- The Eleventh Circuit certified the question to the Florida Supreme Court: does a guilty plea with adjudication withheld qualify as a "conviction" under Fla. Stat. § 790.23(1)(a) (Florida's felon-in-possession statute)?
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a guilty plea with adjudication withheld counts as a "conviction" under Fla. Stat. § 790.23(1)(a) | Government: prior plea of guilt should suffice as a conviction for § 790.23 purposes (and thus for § 922(g)) | Jenkins: withheld adjudication means no conviction under Florida law; § 790.23 requires an adjudication | No. The Florida Supreme Court held a withheld adjudication does not qualify as a conviction for § 790.23(1)(a). |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. McFadden, 772 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 2000) (defines "conviction" for impeachment purposes to require adjudication)
- State v. Gazda, 257 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1971) (older authority treating guilty plea/ verdict as determination of guilt without requiring adjudication in a different statutory context)
- State v. Snyder, 673 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1996) (describing § 790.23's purpose to keep firearms from those adjudicated unfit)
- State v. Castillo, 590 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holds § 790.23 requires adjudication)
- State v. Menuto, 912 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (following Castillo; withheld adjudication not a conviction for § 790.23)
- United States v. Orellanes, 809 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1987) (Eleventh Circuit held withheld adjudication may qualify as a conviction for federal statutes)
- United States v. Grinkiewicz, 873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir. 1989) (affirming Orellanes)
- United States v. Chubbuck, 252 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2001) (applies Eleventh Circuit precedent but notes Florida law developments may undermine it)
- McCrae v. State, 395 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1980) (recognizes some statutes treat pleas without adjudication as convictions when legislative purpose requires it)
