midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
482 F. App'x 750
4th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Creditors obtained a judgment in 1994 against Debtors for $2.84 million plus fees; Debtors later filed Chapter 11 in 2008 and converted to Chapter 7.
  • Cheyenne Sales Co. used as conduit; Debtors transferred assets to Transferees Virgil D. LaRosa and Sandra La-Rosa in alleged WVUFTA violations.
  • Creditors pursued WVUFTA claims in West Virginia; district court awarded $1,191,609 and attached assets valued at $6.799 million.
  • Transfer categories included a $491,609 ante-judgment transfer and Cheyenne’s purchase of annuities funded by a $700,000 line-of-credit drawdown.
  • Court held the WVUFTA claims on the line of credit were time-barred under the statute of repose, but vacated and remanded on other WVUFTA issues.
  • Court remanded to determine valuations for Cheyenne-Regal transfers and specify the Debtors’ transferred assets.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether WVUFTA claim on line-of-credit drawdown is time-barred Creditors argue tolling of repose began with fraudulent transfers Transferees contend accrual and repose ran from 2001 write-and-deliver dates Claim time-barred; but reversed on this point and remanded for further findings on related transfers
Whether district court abused Rule 59(e) in denying increased damages Creditors sought larger award including Cheyenne-Regal transfers Transferees argued no basis for higher award Abuse of discretion; remanded to determine asset transfers and award amount
What assets were transferred from Debtors to trigger WVUFTA violations and amount Creditors seek damages for assets transferring from Debtors District court failed to specify asset transfers and values Remand to identify transferred assets and recalculate award; specify asset transferred under WVUFTA

Key Cases Cited

  • Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162 (4th Cir. 1988) (statute of repose interpretation and testing period guidance)
  • Rubin v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 661 F.2d 979 (2d Cir. 1981) (obligation incurred timing for guaranties under UFTA amendments)
  • Collison v. International Chem. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 1994) (abuse of discretion standards and Rule 59(e) review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Joseph Larosa v. Virgil Larosa
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 30, 2012
Citations: 482 F. App'x 750; 11-1234, 11-1306
Docket Number: 11-1234, 11-1306
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In