Joseph Greer v. Ashley M. Clark
2020 CA 001585
| Ky. Ct. App. | Jun 24, 2021Background
- Parties: Ashley Clark (petitioner/appellee) and Joseph Greer (respondent/appellant) share two sons and are unmarried.
- On Nov. 9, 2020, after a visitation pickup at Greer’s home an argument erupted; both admit to using vulgar language.
- Clark testified Greer pushed her multiple times (once felt like a punch to the chest), took a knife and attempted to damage their shared car’s tires, and repeatedly pounded on the driver’s side window as she fled with the children.
- Greer denied any physical contact or attempt to damage the car. A nonparty reported Clark described being bumped and the tire incident.
- Clark did not call police, seek medical treatment, or photograph injuries; she obtained an Emergency Protective Order that night and the circuit court entered a DVO on Dec. 7, 2020.
- Greer appealed, arguing insufficient evidence that domestic violence occurred and that it may recur.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Clark) | Defendant's Argument (Greer) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether sufficient evidence shows domestic violence occurred on Nov. 9, 2020 | Clark testified to repeated pushes, attempted tire damage with a knife, and pounding on the car window causing fear | Denies any physical contact or car damage attempt; points to lack of corroboration (no police, photos, medical) | Court upheld DVO; trial court may credit Clark’s testimony and found it met preponderance standard |
| Whether domestic violence may occur again (predictive finding) | Prior physical incidents, a 2014 DVO against Greer, ongoing conflict, and shared children create a risk of recurrence | Argues current record insufficient to predict future violence given lack of corroboration | Court found history and totality of circumstances supported reasonable prediction that violence may recur; affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Guenther v. Guenther, 379 S.W.3d 796 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012) (statutory requirement of both occurrence and likelihood findings)
- Hall v. Smith, 599 S.W.3d 451 (Ky. Ct. App. 2020) (preponderance means more likely than not)
- Pettingill v. Pettingill, 480 S.W.3d 920 (Ky. 2015) (predictive standard requires totality-of-circumstances analysis)
- Boone v. Boone, 501 S.W.3d 434 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) (liberal construction of protective-order statutes; standard of review)
- Caudill v. Caudill, 318 S.W.3d 112 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010) (mere unwanted touching may be insufficient for domestic violence)
- Bailey v. Bailey, 231 S.W.3d 793 (Ky. Ct. App. 2007) (family court has broad discretion to accept or reject testimony)
- Hunter v. Mena, 302 S.W.3d 93 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010) (credibility determinations are for the trial court)
