History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jordet v. Jordet
2012 ND 231
| N.D. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Bradley Jordet and Tracy Jordet are divorced (2010) with Bradley having primary custody; Tracy ordered to pay child support and Bradley to pay rehabilitative spousal support, both accruing arrears.
  • Bradley sought a money judgment for past-due child support and an equitable setoff of past-due spousal support against Tracy’s child support arrearages.
  • Tracy obtained a money judgment against Bradley for spousal arrears and opposed the setoff; the district court denied Bradley’s offset as contrary to statute and leading authorities.
  • Bradley later executed against Tracy’s assets; sheriff levied Tracy’s bank accounts after a notice of levy.
  • Tracy sought contempt against Garaas (Bradley’s attorney) for allegedly directing the levy, leading to a contempt order and a $1,000 fine against Garaas.
  • The appellate court affirmed the denial of the offset but reversed the contempt finding against Garaas.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the offset. Jordet argues the offset should be allowed. Jordet argues offset is improper under statute and precedent. No abuse of discretion; offset denied.
Whether Garaas was properly found in contempt for aiding the levy. Tracy contends Garaas violated the court order and obstructed justice. Garaas argues actions were lawful advocacy or did not amount to contempt. Abuse of discretion: contempt reversed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Corbett v. Corbett, 2002 ND 103 (North Dakota 2002) (offset framework misapplied in context of spousal/child support)
  • Corbett v. Corbett, 2001 ND 113 (North Dakota 2001) (initial Corbett I on offset not controlling here)
  • Dakota Partners, L.L.P. v. Glopak, Inc., 2001 ND 168 (North Dakota 2001) (discussion of setoff; equity and mutuality)
  • Investors Title Ins. Co. v. Herzig, 2010 ND 169 (North Dakota 2010) (correct result may follow from correct law; burden on abuse of discretion)
  • Moch v. Moch, 1998 ND 95 (North Dakota 1998) (abuse of discretion standard for equitable decisions)
  • Johnson v. Johnson, 527 N.W.2d 663 (North Dakota 1995) (enforcement remedies for child support)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jordet v. Jordet
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 5, 2012
Citation: 2012 ND 231
Docket Number: 20120185
Court Abbreviation: N.D.