History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. Town of East Haven
691 F.3d 72
| 1st Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Jones shot and killed by East Haven Officer Flodquist in 1997; Emma Jones sues Town, Flodquist, and DePalma under §1983 for constitutional violations.
  • Plaintiff contends Town had a custom, policy, or usage of deliberate indifference to the rights of black people.
  • Jury found the officers liable but Town liable overall; district court denied the Town’s Rule 50 motion.
  • Appellate court holds plaintiff’s evidence insufficient to establish Monell liability and reverses in favor of Town.
  • Court outlines Monell standards, deliberate indifference, and need for supervisory awareness or action.
  • Case remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the Town; district court to vacate Plaintiff’s judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is there sufficient Monell liability evidence? Jones argues Town’s pattern of abuse shows deliberate indifference. Town contends evidence fails to show widespread custom or supervisory tolerance. Insufficient evidence to support Monell liability.
Do the six incidents establish a municipal policy or custom? Aggregate incidents show persistent abuse by officers. Incidents are isolated and not tied to Town policy or deliberate indifference. Not enough to infer a Town policy or custom.
Was the district court correct to deny JMOL under Rule 50? Plaintiff asserts sufficient evidence of municipal liability. Evidence does not meet deliberate indifference standard. Grant of JMOL for the Town appropriate.
What standard governs deliberate indifference in Monell claims? Policy-makers were aware or should have been aware of abuses. No evidence of supervisory awareness or inaction showing policy. Deliberate indifference not proven; Monell liability not established.

Key Cases Cited

  • Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (establishes municipal liability via custom or policy; moving force requirement)
  • Connick v. Thompson, 131 S. Ct. 1350 (2011) (municipal liability for persistent, widespread practices; policy/indifference)
  • Brown v. Bresnahan?, 520 U.S. 397 (1997) (deliberate indifference standard; notice and inaction for constitutional violations)
  • City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989) (policy-maker disregard of risk; deliberate indifference through inaction)
  • Amnesty Am. v. Town of West Hartford, 361 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2004) (2004) (deliberate indifference can be shown where supervisors tolerate abuse)
  • Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) (use of force where suspect poses danger; warnings may be feasible)
  • Cash v. County of Erie, 654 F.3d 324 (2011) (deliberate choice required, not mere negligence)
  • Nimely v. City of New York, 414 F.3d 381 (2005) (standard for reviewing Rule 50 denial in §1983 cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Town of East Haven
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Aug 1, 2012
Citation: 691 F.3d 72
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 10-4731-cv (L), 10-4894-cv
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.