History
  • No items yet
midpage
JONES v. the STATE.
348 Ga. App. 653
Ga. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2015 James Jones pleaded guilty, via a negotiated plea, to molesting his stepdaughter; the trial court accepted the plea as knowing and voluntary.
  • Sentence: 13 years with 8 to serve, plus a determinate probation term; imprisonment to run concurrent with any sentence then serving.
  • Probation included a special condition prohibiting contact with the victim and Jones’s biological son (born from the molestation), but allowed contact if a judge ordered it (leaving open legitimization/visitation).
  • Jones’s plea agreement included a waiver of the right to seek sentence modification and to appeal.
  • On December 14, 2017 (within one year of sentencing), Jones filed a motion to modify his sentence under OCGA § 17-10-1(f), challenging the probation conditions as unlawful/indeterminate; the trial court denied the motion without a hearing.
  • Jones appealed; the State moved to dismiss arguing untimeliness and waiver from the plea; the Court of Appeals addressed timeliness and merits regarding illegality of the sentence.

Issues

Issue Jones’s Argument State’s Argument Held
Timeliness of § 17-10-1(f) motion Motion was filed within one year so timely Motion untimely Motion was timely (filed within one year of sentencing)
Waiver of right to seek modification Waiver in plea should not bar review because sentence may be illegal Waiver bars relief under the plea agreement Waiver applies unless sentence is illegal; court considered illegality claim on merits
Prior probation revocation/consecutive sentences (1996 case) Revocation and consecutive sentencing were improper Not addressed in detail Argument not raised below and no record supplied; court declined to consider it
Whether probation no-contact condition made sentence indeterminate or illegally terminated parental rights Condition effectively creates indeterminate sentence and terminates parental rights; victim wanted contact Special condition is permissible and does not make sentence indeterminate; waiver applies Condition did not render the sentence indeterminate nor illegally terminate parental rights; condition was within trial court’s discretion; appeal dismissed under waiver

Key Cases Cited

  • Richardson v. State, 334 Ga. App. 344 (general standard: appellate review of sentence within statutory parameters)
  • Rush v. State, 276 Ga. 541 (defendant may waive post-conviction relief in a plea agreement)
  • Sumner v. State, 284 Ga. App. 308 (waiver does not apply where sentence is illegal)
  • Daniels v. State, 244 Ga. App. 522 (issues not raised below are not reviewed on appeal)
  • Adams v. State, 282 Ga. App. 819 (appellate review requires relevant record materials)
  • Rooney v. State, 311 Ga. App. 376 (trial court may impose probation conditions)
  • Mullens v. State, 289 Ga. App. 872 (upholding no-contact probation conditions including with defendant’s children)
  • Mathews v. State, 234 Ga. App. 111 (no-contact condition reasonable despite victim’s desire to continue contact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: JONES v. the STATE.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 19, 2019
Citation: 348 Ga. App. 653
Docket Number: A18A1912
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.