966 N.E.2d 1256
Ind.2012Background
- Jones was charged with murder and tendered instructions for reckless homicide and involuntary manslaughter as lesser offenses.
- The trial court refused the lesser-included-offense instructions for lack of evidentiary support.
- A jury convicted Jones of murder.
- The Court of Appeals adopted Wright v. State’s test and upheld the trial court’s refusals.
- The Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer and adopted the Court of Appeals’ reasoning.
- The State argued no evidence supported reckless homicide and the information foreclosed involuntary manslaughter.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether reckless homicide instruction is supported by the evidence | Jones: instruction warranted by evidence | State: no serious evidentiary dispute; not supported | Reckless homicide instruction properly refused |
| Whether involuntary manslaughter instruction is foreclosed by the charging information | Jones: charging information allowed I.M. instruction as lesser offense | State: information omits battery, foreclosing I.M. | Involuntary manslaughter instruction foreclosed by charging information |
Key Cases Cited
- Wright v. State, 658 N.E.2d 563 (Ind. 1995) (three-step test for lesser-included offense instructions)
- Jones v. State, 948 N.E.2d 1197 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (reckless homicide as inherently included; evidentiary dispute standard)
- Horan v. State, 682 N.E.2d 502 (Ind. 1997) (prolonged conduct and awareness standard for guilt)
- Lyttle v. State, 709 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 1999) (prolonged conduct reviewed for inclusion of offenses)
