History
  • No items yet
midpage
101 So. 3d 731
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Carrie Jones filed for divorce from Donald Jones; Rankin County Chancery Court dismissed the complaint; Carrie appeals.
  • Divorce grounds were habitual cruel and inhuman treatment; the trial was bifurcated with the divorce issue heard first.
  • At the end of Carrie’s evidence, Donald moved for Rule 41(b) dismissal; the chancellor dismissed the divorce without granting relief on custody or support.
  • Donald then dismissed his counter-complaint; Carrie challenged only the dismissal of her divorce and the court’s handling of custody and child-support claims.
  • The court held the chancellor had no obligation to adjudicate custody after a dismissal of the divorce, and affirmed the dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Duty to adjudicate custody after dismissal Jones argues custody should be adjudicated despite divorce dismissal. Jones argues chancellor need not adjudicate custody on dismissal alone. No obligation to adjudicate custody after dismissal; affirmed.
Independence of custody claims under Rule 41(b) and §93-11-65 Jones contends custody/support are independent actions under 93-11-65. Jones contends custody claims are not independent; governed by divorce. Custody claims are not independent; proper to dismiss with the divorce.

Key Cases Cited

  • Waller v. Waller, 754 So.2d 1181 (Miss. 2000) (court may provide for custody after dismissing a divorce, but not required)
  • Slaughter v. Slaughter, 869 So.2d 386 (Miss. 2004) (custody matter may not proceed under 93-11-65 during pending divorce)
  • Anderson v. Anderson, 961 So.2d 55 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) (reversed dismissal before all evidence in a custody-modification context)
  • In re Adoption of D.N.T., 843 So.2d 690 (Miss. 2003) (court guardian role for children; constitutional duty to protect children)
  • Kennedy v. Kennedy, 650 So.2d 1362 (Miss. 1995) (standard for reviewing Rule 41(b) dismissals)
  • Ainsworth v. Callon Petroleum Co., 521 So.2d 1272 (Miss. 1987) (abuse of discretion standard in Rule 41(b) review)
  • Harrell v. Harrell, 231 So.2d 793 (Miss. 1970) (discretion of chancellors in domestic-relations matters)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Jones
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Nov 13, 2012
Citations: 101 So. 3d 731; 2012 WL 5477210; 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 686; No. 2011-CA-01416-COA
Docket Number: No. 2011-CA-01416-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Jones v. Jones, 101 So. 3d 731