2024-CA-01332-COA
Miss. Ct. App.Jul 28, 2026Background
- McCallum entered an employment contract with JFMC and its satellite clinics in 2018, and JFMC later sued her for breach of contract and to enforce a noncompete and liquidated-damages provisions. 1
- McCallum answered in 2019 without pleading unconscionability, then later filed an amended answer in 2021 asserting unconscionability as a defense. 2
- The parties conducted extensive litigation, including depositions, subpoenas, written discovery, hearings, and repeated motions to compel. 3
- In June 2023, McCallum moved for summary judgment, arguing the employment agreement was procedurally and substantively unconscionable and unenforceable. 4
- The county court granted summary judgment for McCallum, but the circuit court affirmed; JFMC appealed. 5
- The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits, holding that McCallum waived the unconscionability defense by delaying its pursuit while actively litigating. 6
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Did McCallum waive unconscionability as an affirmative defense? 7 | JFMC said McCallum waited too long while actively litigating. | McCallum said discovery delays and COVID justified the delay. | Yes; the defense was waived, so summary judgment was improper. 8 |
| Should the contract's unconscionability be reached on the merits? 9 | JFMC argued the contract was not unconscionable. | McCallum argued the contract was unenforceable. | No; the court reversed on waiver and remanded for trial. 10 |
Key Cases Cited
- Byram Cafe Grp. LLC v. Tucker, 344 So. 3d 844 (Miss. 2022) (summary judgment is reviewed de novo 11)
- Todd v. First Baptist Church of W. Point, 993 So. 2d 827 (Miss. 2008) (summary judgment is reversed if triable material facts exist 12)
- Cook v. Taylor, 324 So. 3d 333 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021) (waiver of an affirmative defense is reviewed for abuse of discretion 13)
- MS Credit Ctr. Inc. v. Horton, 926 So. 2d 167 (Miss. 2006) (unjustified delay plus active litigation can waive an affirmative defense 14)
- Sanderson v. Sanderson, 170 So. 3d 430 (Miss. 2014) (unconscionability is measured when the agreement is executed 15)
- Murphy v. William Carey Univ., 382 So. 3d 1181 (Miss. Ct. App. 2024) (waiver found where an affirmative defense was not timely raised while actively litigating 16)
