Jonathan Edward Boyer v. Louisiana
569 U.S. 238
SCOTUS2013Background
- Boyer and his brother hitchhiked in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana; Boyer robbed and murdered a driver and fled to Florida.
- Boyer was indicted in Louisiana for first-degree murder and the state sought the death penalty; defense funds were in dispute.
- From 2002 to 2006, funding hearings and related delays dominated proceedings, with multiple continuances and Hurricane disruptions.
- In 2005–2006, a funding hearing occurred; the state then ceased seeking the death penalty, reducing defense complexity and costs.
- Lorenzi, the lead defense attorney, was replaced by LCAC attorneys paid by the State, shifting lead counsel; the case proceeded slowly.
- Boyer was tried and convicted in 2009 after a seven-year delay, with the Louisiana appellate court holding most delay was caused by funding but not weighing it against the State.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a State's failure to fund indigent defense is weighed against the State in speedy-trial analysis | Boyer | Louisiana | Yes; such delay weighs against the State |
Key Cases Cited
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1972) (speedy-trial standard balancing four factors)
- Vermont v. Brillon, 556 U.S. 81 (U.S. 2009) (state-system delays may be charged to the State)
- Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1991) (plurality on attributing responsibility for delays)
- United States v. Loud Hawk, 474 U.S. 302 (U.S. 1986) (weights of reasons for delay vary by context)
