History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. State
49 So. 3d 130
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Johnson was convicted of possession of cocaine by a Marion County jury, with a 16-year sentence, 9 years suspended, 5 years post-release supervision, and a $3,000 fine.
  • MBN narcotics agents conducted a buy-bust operation targeting Teddy; cocaine was purchased by an informant from Teddy at a store.
  • Johnson arrived at the scene during Teddy's arrest, was detained near the car, and a search of the car led to a 0.7 gram cocaine rock.
  • Johnson moved to suppress the cocaine as the result of an illegal search; the circuit court denied the suppression motion but granted a motion in limine to exclude prior conviction references.
  • At trial, Johnson challenged the evidence’s sufficiency for constructive possession and later sought JNOV or a new trial, which the court denied.
  • The Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed, holding the vehicle search reasonable and the evidence sufficient for constructive possession.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the vehicle search unconstitutional, requiring suppression? Johnson Johnson Search was reasonable; denial affirmed
Was there sufficient evidence of constructive possession to sustain conviction? Johnson State Evidence supported constructive possession
Did the circuit court err in denying JNOV or a new trial? Johnson State Denial affirmed; evidence supported verdict

Key Cases Cited

  • Baker v. State, 991 So. 2d 185 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings)
  • Qualls v. State, 947 So. 2d 365 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) (credibility/appellate review of evidence)
  • Simmons v. State, 805 So. 2d 452 (Miss. 2001) (abuse of discretion in evidentiary rulings)
  • Taylor v. State, 733 So. 2d 251 (Miss. 1999) (weight of the evidence review framework)
  • McLendon v. State, 945 So. 2d 372 (Miss. 2006) (Fourth Amendment application to seizures)
  • Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court 1979) (detention without arrest; ambiguous situations)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court 1968) (stop-and-frisk safety rationale)
  • Dees v. State, 758 So. 2d 492 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) (officer safety in investigations)
  • United States v. Sanders, 994 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1993) (handcuffing and safety considerations)
  • Ferrell v. State, 649 So. 2d 831 (Miss. 1995) (search incident to arrest; owner/possession nuances)
  • Gant, U.S. _, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (Supreme Court 2009) (vehicle search incident to arrest requirements)
  • Harris v. State, 977 So. 2d 1248 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (ownership/possession linkage in constructive possession cases)
  • Barnett v. State, 987 So. 2d 1070 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (constructive possession framework)
  • Curry v. State, 249 So. 2d 414 (Miss. 1971) (constructive possession elements)
  • Roberson v. State, 595 So. 2d 1310 (Miss. 1992) (dominion/control over contraband elements)
  • Stevenson v. State, 733 So. 2d 177 (Miss. 1998) (weight/credibility assessment by appellate court)
  • Fulgham v. State, 12 So. 3d 558 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009) (weight-of-the-evidence standard for new trial)
  • Hearn v. State, 3 So. 3d 722 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (new trial weight standard)
  • Bush v. State, 895 So. 2d 836 (Miss. 2005) (new trial weight considerations)
  • United States v. Albert, 579 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2009) (drug transaction proximity factor for frisk)
  • United States v. Garcia, 459 F.3d 1059 (10th Cir. 2006) (drug transaction proximity factor for frisk)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Nov 30, 2010
Citation: 49 So. 3d 130
Docket Number: 2009-KA-00552-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.