History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
853 F. Supp. 2d 487
E.D. Pa.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs filed in state court alleging thalidomide caused birth defects; case removed to federal court on diversity grounds.
  • Court must evaluate whether any defendant shares the same state citizenship as any plaintiff at filing and removal.
  • GSK LLC and Holdings are central to the diversity analysis due to their corporate structure and Delaware nexus.
  • Avantor’s nerve center moved after removal; evidence indicates New Jersey citizenship at relevant times.
  • Court rejects plaintiffs’ “holding company” exception argument and concludes Holdings and LLC are Delaware citizens.
  • SmithKline Beecham’s consent to removal is contested, but the court finds the real party in interest is GSK LLC, not the dissolved SmithKline Beecham entity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Diversity: are GSK LLC and Holdings Delaware citizens? Plaintiffs rely on Brewer to claim PA citizenship for both. GSK LLC and Holdings are Delaware citizens; Holdings’ nerve center in Delaware. GSK LLC and Holdings are Delaware citizens.
Avantor’s domicile at removal time Avantor’s nerve center was in Center Valley, PA. Evidence shows headquarters moved to New Jersey before removal. Avantor was a New Jersey citizen at relevant times.
SmithKline Beecham consent to removal SmithKline Beecham did not consent; unanimity required. GSK LLC is the real party in interest; SmithKline Beecham exists only nominally. SmithKline Beecham’s consent not required; removal valid because GSK LLC consented.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S. Ct. 1181 (U.S. 2010) (nerve center test; holding company structure treated distinctly from operating companies)
  • Zambelli Fireworks Mfg. Co. v. Wood, 592 F.3d 412 (3d Cir. 2010) (citizenship of LLC determined by members; holding company structure considered)
  • J.A. Olson Co. v. City of Winona, 818 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1987) (nerve center analysis; delegation and corporate structure considerations)
  • Brewer v. SmithKline Beacham Corp., 774 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Pa. 2011) (holding company vs operating company; crossroads for GSK structure in PA)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 29, 2012
Citation: 853 F. Supp. 2d 487
Docket Number: Civ. No. 11-5782
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Pa.