History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. King
85 So. 3d 307
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • SMCI confiscated all inmates' 16-ounce opaque mugs due to concealment of contraband; Johnson's mug was among them.
  • Johnson bought his mug with inmate funds; no evidence he altered it.
  • Johnson filed MDOC ARP requests (May–Aug 2010) seeking replacement or reimbursement; initial denials followed by exhaustion of ARP.
  • Circuit court affirmed ARP denial; Johnson sued in Greene County Circuit Court for constitutional violation.
  • Court of Appeals reversed and rendered: inappropriate taking without just compensation; ordered replacement mug or reimbursement; costs to appellee.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Takings claim under MS Const. Art. 3 §17 Johnson asserts unconstitutional taking without compensation. MDOC/SMCI argue security-based confiscation allowed; no improper taking. Unconstitutional taking; reversal and render: replacement or reimbursement required.
Inmate property rights under confinement Inmates retain protections against permanent deprivation of property. Prison may deprive under security and management concerns. Constitutional rights applicable; taking without just compensation violated; need remedy.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1984) (prisoners' rights restricted but not abated; cell searches and seizures.)
  • Robinson v. State, 312 So. 2d 15 (Miss. 1975) (cell not private; no expectation of privacy in prison.)
  • City of Vicksburg v. Herman, 16 So. 434 (Miss. 1894) (due compensation for damages from public use.)
  • Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist. v. Wood, 160 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1964) (whether proposed use is public is a judicial question.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. King
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Mar 27, 2012
Citation: 85 So. 3d 307
Docket Number: 2011-CP-00199-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.