Johnson v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
466 Mass. 779
Mass.2014Background
- Dalton Johnson executed a health care proxy on May 24, 2007 appointing Barbara Johnson as his health care agent to make health care decisions for him.
- Dalton was admitted to Brain-tree Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in September 2007, operated by Brain-tree Nursing, LLC.
- On August 6, 2008, Barbara, in her capacity as health care agent, signed an arbitration agreement with the nursing facility to submit disputes to mediation and, if unresolved, arbitration.
- Dalton suffered burns in March 2009 and died on July 27, 2009 while a resident at the facility.
- Plaintiffs, administrators of Dalton’s estate, filed a negligence and wrongful death suit against the facility operators and related providers.
- The trial and appellate proceedings addressed whether Barbara’s arbitration agreement could bind Dalton, given limits of the health care proxy statute.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether arbitration agreement is a health care decision | Health care proxy limited to medical decisions; arbitration is not a health care decision. | Arbitration related to care and disputes arising from care; falls within health care decisions. | Arbitration not a health care decision; not binding on Dalton. |
| Whether Barbara had authority to sign arbitration on Dalton’s behalf | Barbara lacked authority under the health care proxy to bind to arbitration. | Health care agent may decide disputes related to care. | Barbara lacked authority; arbitration binding not established. |
| Scope of health care proxy vs durable power of attorney | Proxy should cover only health care decisions; arbitration is outside that scope. | Proceedings suggest broader authority overlapping with fiduciaries. | Proxy authority narrow to health care decisions; not to arbitration. |
| Impact on FAA and public policy | FAA might enforce arbitration as contracts; policy favors access to courts. | FAA permits arbitration but not beyond health care proxy scope. | FAA considerations do not override the statutory limit; arbitration not compelled. |
Key Cases Cited
- Cohen v. Bolduc, 435 Mass. 608 (2002) (health care proxy limits to health care decisions; autonomy)
- Superintendent of Belchertown State Sch. v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728 (1977) (informed consent and guardianship principles)
- Miller v. Cotter, 448 Mass. 671 (2007) (motion to compel arbitration in nursing facility context)
- Owens v. National Health Corp., 263 S.W.3d 876 (2007) (health care agent authority under durable power of attorney for health care)
- Garrison v. Superior Court, 132 Cal. App. 4th 253 (2005) (contract arbitration within health care context)
