History
  • No items yet
midpage
862 N.W.2d 740
Neb.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Kari and Elizabeth Johnson divorced in January 2010 by stipulated decree: Kari ordered to pay $3,000/month child support while both children were minors.
  • After decree, the children received Social Security benefits based on Kari’s work history; Kari knew of those payments and initially withdrew a motion concerning them.
  • Kari filed to modify child support in September 2011, alleging decreased income and later obtained joint physical custody; trial occurred January 2013. Proceedings were delayed and spanned multiple orders through August 2013.
  • At trial Elizabeth’s actual income was ~$27–28K/year from a trust; she claimed a medical condition limited pilot work. Kari, with long aviation experience, urged imputing Elizabeth’s earning capacity at $52,000/year. The district court accepted $52,000; the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded on that point.
  • The district court reduced Kari’s support retroactive to October 2011, found he had overpaid during the modification pendency, credited part against future support, and entered a lump-sum judgment against Elizabeth for the remainder (including $2,357.90 for an acknowledged withdrawal).
  • Issues on appeal included (1) imputed earning capacity to Elizabeth, (2) whether Kari should receive credit for Social Security benefits paid to the children, and (3) whether Kari was entitled to a credit or lump-sum judgment for alleged overpayments during the modification proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Kari) Defendant's Argument (Elizabeth) Held
Whether district court properly imputed $52,000/yr earning capacity to Elizabeth Court should impute $52K based on Kari’s aviation-industry testimony and opportunities Elizabeth lacks current earning ability; evidence of limited past earnings and medical restriction Reversed: record lacks competent evidence to support $52K; remand for determination of earning capacity
Whether Social Security benefits to the children should credit Kari’s support obligation Kari: benefits are substitute income and should offset his obligation Elizabeth: benefits were not credited at dissolution; treating them as gratuity is equitable Affirmed: benefits treated as gratuity; Kari gets no credit for them on remand
Whether modification can be retroactive to month after filing and grant credit for overpayments Kari: retroactive modification appropriate; he overpaid during pendency and is entitled to credit Elizabeth: Kari agreed to $3,000 in decree; cannot claim overpayment credit Held: Retroactive modification to month after filing is permissible; Kari may be eligible for credit if further evidence shows overpayment (exception to no-credit rule applies)
Whether district court could enter lump-sum judgment against Elizabeth for anticipated unused overpayment Kari: judgment for remaining overpayment appropriate Elizabeth: no showing of means; lump-sum for future obligations improper Reversed: lump-sum judgment for anticipated future credit is impermissible; remand for month-to-month credit application; order $2,357.90 judgment for the admitted withdrawal remains

Key Cases Cited

  • Freeman v. Groskopf, 286 Neb. 713 (2013) (guidance on using earning capacity under Nebraska Child Support Guidelines)
  • Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 (2014) (standard of review for modification of dissolution decrees)
  • Griess v. Griess, 9 Neb. App. 105 (2000) (exception to no-credit-for-voluntary-overpayments rule when equity requires)
  • Jensen v. Jensen, 275 Neb. 921 (2008) (appellate review of child support credit issues)
  • Gibson v. Gibson, 147 Neb. 991 (1947) (disfavoring lump-sum prepayment of future child support)
  • Gress v. Gress, 257 Neb. 112 (1999) (Social Security benefits and child support credit principles)
  • Hanthorn v. Hanthorn, 236 Neb. 225 (1990) (discussing treatment of Social Security benefits in dissolution proceedings)
  • Lainson v. Lainson, 219 Neb. 170 (1985) (court discretion to order child support in addition to Social Security benefits)
  • Brewer v. Brewer, 244 Neb. 731 (1993) (Social Security benefits earned through payroll taxes; not mere gratuity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Johnson
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 2015
Citations: 862 N.W.2d 740; 290 Neb. 838; S-13-775
Docket Number: S-13-775
Court Abbreviation: Neb.
Log In
    Johnson v. Johnson, 862 N.W.2d 740