Johnson v. Henry
206 So. 3d 916
La. Ct. App.2016Background
- Paula Johnson (plaintiff) had her Social Security number taken by coworker Penny Henry, who used it to buy a Gateway computer without Johnson’s knowledge.
- Citibank sued Johnson on the purchased-account when payments stopped; Johnson learned of the fraud after being served.
- Criminal charges against Penny Henry resulted in a pretrial intervention payment of $3,000 in restitution to Johnson and additional voluntary payments for attorney fees.
- Johnson (and husband) filed a civil tort suit; trial court found an intentional tort and awarded Johnson $7,500 in general and special damages and one-third of the judgment as attorney fees; Mr. Johnson’s claims were dismissed.
- The Henrys appealed, raising challenges to the damages amount/offset for restitution, Mr. Henry’s liability, and the award of attorney fees.
- The appellate court affirmed the damages and Mr. Henry’s liability but reversed the award of attorney fees and split appeal costs equally.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Amount of damages for mental anguish | Johnson: $7,500 is supported by humiliation, lost wages, credit complications, and attorney expenses | Henrys: $7,500 excessive given facts and prior restitution | Affirmed — no abuse of discretion in $7,500 award |
| 2) Credit for $3,000 restitution paid in criminal case | Johnson: restitution did not cover general damages like mental anguish; civil award proper | Henrys: restitution should offset civil damages or render additional award excessive | Trial court not required to offset; restitution covers pecuniary loss only; affirmed |
| 3) Mr. Henry’s liability for wife's intentional tort | Johnson: obligation benefitted the family/community, so spouse liable | Henrys: Mr. Henry should not be responsible for spouse’s intentional wrong | Affirmed — community-obligation presumption applies because family benefited |
| 4) Award of attorney fees to Johnson | Johnson: Article 1958 supports fees for fraud | Henrys: no contract/rescission; tort claim, so fees improper | Reversed — Article 1958 applies to contractual rescission fraud only; attorney fees not available in tort here |
Key Cases Cited
- Sims v. Selvage, 499 So.2d 325 (La. App. 1st Cir.) (standard for reviewing lump-sum general and special damages)
- Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La.) (abuse-of-discretion standard for damage awards)
- Bryan v. City of New Orleans, 737 So.2d 696 (La.) (presumption and review principles for lump-sum awards)
- National Food Stores of La., Inc. v. Chustz, 385 So.2d 374 (La. App. 1st Cir.) (criminal restitution may be credited but offset not mandatory)
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. Chalona, 293 So.2d 498 (La. App. 4th Cir.) (similar treatment of restitution and civil offset)
- Nassif v. Sunrise Homes, Inc., 739 So.2d 183 (La.) (attorney fees are available only by contract or statute)
- Coates v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 786 So.2d 749 (La. App. 4th Cir.) (Article 1958 applies to rescission-for-fraud claims, not all fraud)
- Delahoussaye v. Bd. of Sup’rs of Community & Technical Colleges, 906 So.2d 646 (La. App. 1st Cir.) (written reasons do not control over signed judgment)
