Johnson v. Desert Fire LLC
6:25-cv-00037
D. Or.Jul 9, 2025Background
- Plaintiff Ashara Ramirez, a former dancer at Silver Dollar Club in Eugene, Oregon, filed a collective action lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) against Desert Fire LLC and Damon Shrader, alleging misclassification and various wage violations.
- Ramirez claims Defendants misclassified dancers as independent contractors, failed to pay wages, required kickback payments (house fees), and imposed a forced tipping policy benefiting non-dancer staff and the club.
- The collective action seeks to represent current and former dancers from May 2021 to June 2024 under the same employment conditions at the single business location.
- Plaintiff moved for conditional certification of the FLSA collective, court-approved notice to potential class members, and equitable tolling of the statute of limitations.
- Defendants did not oppose conditional certification but raised various objections to notice procedures, content, and the extent/timing of equitable tolling.
- The court granted the motion in part, conditionally certifying the collective, modifying the notice plan, and granting partial equitable tolling.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conditional certification of collective class | Dancers were subject to common, unlawful policies and are similarly situated. | Reserved right to oppose later, but did not contest preliminary certification. | Granted conditional certification. |
| Scope & content of court-approved notice | Broad, multi-channel notice plan; three-year class; court-ordered disclosure of contacts. | Notices are confusing/misleading; privacy concerns; limit unsolicited communication; poster size. | Notice approved in part, with format/content changes. |
| Procedures for notifying potential class members | Multiple reminders; public and dressing room notice; assuage retaliation fears. | Limit contacts/reminders; restrict posting at public entrance; challenge poster size. | Notice in dressing rooms only; limited contacts. |
| Equitable tolling of statute of limitations | Court delay is beyond plaintiffs' control; fairness requires tolling. | No wrongful conduct or extraordinary circumstances; tolling contrary to Congressional design. | Granted from briefing completion until notice issue. |
Key Cases Cited
- Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 903 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2018) (establishes two-step process for FLSA collective certification and the "similarly situated" standard)
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165 (1989) (approves court-supervised notice to potential plaintiffs in FLSA collective actions)
- Am. Pipe & Const. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974) (addresses statute of limitations tolling in class actions but not FLSA collectives)
- Stoll v. Runyon, 165 F.3d 1238 (9th Cir. 1999) (equitable tolling based on extraordinary circumstances)
