John Edward Hardin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
1246162
| Va. Ct. App. | Sep 5, 2017Background
- On June 7, 2015, John Edward Hardin was driving an 18‑wheel tractor‑trailer on Route 1 at night when his truck struck and killed cyclist Kristina Goodrow riding on the right shoulder.
- The roadway was unlit, speed limit 45 mph; the right northbound lane was ~11 feet wide, the truck front ~8 feet, and the bicycle handlebars just over 2 feet.
- Hardin told officers at the scene he first saw what he thought was a bicyclist "four to five hundred feet" away, had his bright lights on, and attempted to move left but thought vehicles occupied the left lane.
- Video and a civilian witness (driving behind Hardin) contradicted aspects of Hardin’s later testimony; the witness said he did not see Hardin brake, honk, or change lanes before the collision.
- Officer measured the distance from the impact to where Hardin stopped at 408.9 feet; the trial court credited Hardin’s initial statement that he first saw the bicyclist 400–500 feet away and found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter for criminal negligence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Commonwealth) | Defendant's Argument (Hardin) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the evidence sufficed to prove criminal negligence for involuntary manslaughter | Hardin saw the victim 400–500 ft away, had time and distance to avoid collision, and failed to take evasive action, showing reckless disregard | Hardin argued his later statements and trial testimony show he saw the bicyclist only 150–180 ft away and had no time to react; his initial statement cannot alone sustain conviction | Court affirmed: factfinder credited initial statement and found sufficient evidence of criminal negligence |
| Whether the extrajudicial statement that he first saw the bicyclist 400–500 ft away was an uncorroborated confession that cannot support conviction | The statement was an admission against penal interest supporting guilt and did not constitute an uncorroborated confession requiring reversal | Hardin argued the statement was uncorroborated and inconsistent with other testimony and therefore insufficient | Court held the statement was an admission (not a full confession) and, when credited with other evidence (stopping distance), supported conviction |
Key Cases Cited
- Greenway v. Commonwealth, 254 Va. 147 (definition of involuntary manslaughter as killing from negligence so gross as to show reckless disregard)
- Gooden v. Commonwealth, 226 Va. 565 (criminal negligence requires unlawful performance of a lawful act so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show reckless disregard)
- Jenkins v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 104 (conviction reversed where defendant saw victim only immediately before impact)
- Richardson v. Commonwealth, 192 Va. 55 (tractor‑trailer operator guilty where maneuver showed utter disregard for pedestrian safety)
- Carminade v. Commonwealth, 230 Va. 505 (distinguishing confession from admission against interest)
