271 So. 3d 552
Miss. Ct. App.2018Background
- On Nov. 25, 2013, Preston and Candi McGreger discovered their Calhoun County home had been burglarized; three TVs and a briefcase with personal documents were taken.
- The McGregers later saw a Craigslist listing for three TVs matching the stolen items; a meeting was arranged at a Dollar General in Vardaman with the sellers.
- Deputy Robertson and another officer met Tutor and Jessica Leister at the meeting, detained them, and later executed a warrant at Leister’s Water Valley home where three TVs and the briefcase were recovered and identified by the McGregers.
- Leister (who pled guilty in exchange for testifying) testified that Tutor took three TVs from the McGregers’ house that day and placed them in her vehicle; she also testified Tutor claimed the briefcase bore his fingerprints.
- Tutor was convicted by a jury of burglary of a dwelling. The State amended the indictment to designate Tutor a habitual offender based on two prior felonies (a 2007 burglary and an uttering of forgery); Tutor was sentenced to 25 years as a habitual offender.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legality of habitual-offender sentence (predicate convictions arose from same incident) | Tutor: prior burglary and forgery are part of same continuous incident and thus cannot both be used as predicates | State: prior convictions were separate incidents occurring on different days and qualify as separate predicates | Affirmed: prior offenses occurred on different days and were sufficiently distinct to qualify as predicate felonies for habitual-offender status |
| Verdict against overwhelming weight of the evidence | Tutor: insufficient/weak evidence—no stolen items found on him; main witness (Leister) is unreliable | State: issue is procedurally defaulted for failure to file a motion for new trial; evidence (Leister, neighbor, recovered items) supports conviction | Affirmed: claim procedurally barred for failing to file new-trial motion; alternatively, weight of evidence supports verdict |
Key Cases Cited
- Pittman v. State, 570 So. 2d 1205 (Miss. 1990) (events must be sufficiently separate in time for prior convictions to count as distinct predicates)
- Burkhalter v. State, 179 So. 3d 67 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015) (predicate felonies must arise from separate incidents)
- Drummer v. State, 167 So. 3d 1180 (Miss. 2015) (same principle that prior convictions must be separate incidents)
- McClain v. State, 625 So. 2d 774 (Miss. 1993) (distinction between sufficiency and weight-of-the-evidence challenges)
- Jackson v. State, 423 So. 2d 129 (Miss. 1982) (requires preservation of weight-of-the-evidence claims via motion for new trial)
