History
  • No items yet
midpage
891 N.W.2d 418
Iowa
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Jeremy D. Yocum pled guilty to failure to appear for sentencing in violation of Iowa Code § 811.2(8) (2007).
  • Yocum filed a postconviction-relief (PCR) action claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, including that counsel allowed him to plead guilty without a factual basis.
  • The district court denied all ineffective-assistance claims. The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal but found the record insufficient to decide whether a factual basis existed for the plea.
  • The Iowa Supreme Court granted further review to resolve whether a factual basis supported Yocum’s plea.
  • The record showed Yocum had been released from county jail to an Iowa Residential Treatment Center after being unable to post a $100,000 bond, later pled guilty in a related case (FECR007473), was given a sentencing date, failed to appear, and an arrest warrant issued. The plea court took judicial notice of the related file without objection.
  • The Supreme Court concluded the district court could rely on the file and Yocum’s statements to find a factual basis for the failure-to-appear plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a factual basis existed for Yocum’s guilty plea Yocum: plea lacked a factual basis because the record did not clearly show the elements of failure to appear State: related court file and Yocum’s admissions supplied the factual basis Court held a factual basis existed based on the related file and Yocum’s statements; plea upheld
Whether court could rely on judicially noticed file to establish factual basis Yocum: reliance on outside file was improper or insufficient State: district court may consider any matter in the record, including judicially noticed files Court held the court properly relied on the file; defendant did not object to notice
Appropriate remedy if no factual basis existed Yocum: if no basis, plea should be vacated and charges dismissed or remanded for proceedings State: if record could support a factual basis, remand for further proceedings Court applied established framework: factual basis present so no remedy needed
Other ineffective-assistance claims raised in PCR Yocum: multiple additional counsel errors asserted State: district court correctly rejected claims on the merits Court found other claims meritless and adopted district court findings

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Schminkey, 597 N.W.2d 785 (Iowa 1999) (court must examine entire record to determine if a factual basis for a guilty plea exists and prescribes remedies when none exists)
  • State v. Allen, 708 N.W.2d 361 (Iowa 2006) (when record may support a factual basis, remand allows the State to try to establish it; if not, vacate plea and allow reinstatement of charges)
  • State v. Finney, 834 N.W.2d 46 (Iowa 2013) (district court may rely on any matter in the record to determine the factual basis for a plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Jeremy D. Yocum v. State of Iowa
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Mar 10, 2017
Citations: 891 N.W.2d 418; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 22; 2017 WL 942843; 15–0545
Docket Number: 15–0545
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
Log In
    Jeremy D. Yocum v. State of Iowa, 891 N.W.2d 418