Jeffery L. Nutt v. State
A18A0878
| Ga. Ct. App. | Jan 9, 2018Background
- In Sept. 2012 Jeffery L. Nutt pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with intent to rape, three counts of battery, and simple battery; total sentence 10 years, with 2 years to serve and the rest on probation.
- Nutt’s probation was partially revoked by consent in Aug. 2016, revoking three years and terminating the remainder.
- In May 2017 Nutt filed a “motion to vacate void part of sentence,” arguing he was never properly notified at plea or judgment that he would be required to register as a sex offender under OCGA § 42-1-12 based on the aggravated assault with intent to rape conviction.
- The trial court denied relief; Nutt appealed directly to the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
- The Court of Appeals found it lacked jurisdiction to review the claim because Nutt did not raise a colorable claim that his sentence was void and his motion to withdraw the guilty plea (if construed as such) was untimely.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the sex-offender registration requirement renders the sentence void | Nutt: Failure to notify at plea/judgment that registration would be required makes part of the sentence void | State: Registration requirement is statutory consequence of the conviction and does not make the sentence exceed statutory punishment | Court: No — registration requirement is authorized by statute; sentence not void |
| Whether the trial court had authority to modify the sentence after statutory period | Nutt: Seeks relief after imposition; implies modification is appropriate | State: Modifications limited to statutory window; after that only void sentences may be altered | Court: Statutory period expired; absent a void sentence, court lacked power to modify |
| Whether the motion is properly treated as a motion to withdraw guilty plea and is timely | Nutt: Implicitly argues plea was defective due to lack of notice | State: A motion to withdraw guilty plea must be filed in same term and is untimely here | Court: If construed as motion to withdraw plea, it is untimely and court lacked jurisdiction to grant it |
Key Cases Cited
- Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346 (2010) (describes statutory window for sentence modification and when only void sentences may be altered)
- Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669 (2004) (defines a void sentence as punishment the law does not allow and limits post-period modification)
- Ellison v. State, 283 Ga. 461 (2008) (motion to withdraw a guilty plea must be filed in the same term of court; untimely motions cannot be granted)
