History
  • No items yet
midpage
James v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois
959 N.E.2d 599
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • James purchased Safeco auto insurance in 2002, with the 2002 Hyundai Santa Fe listed as the insured vehicle.
  • In 2008, Safeco added the 2008 Mustang to the policy and, later that year, Eason became a listed driver.
  • Eason did not reside with James and kept the Mustang at Eason's residence; James later claimed Eason did not contribute to the lease.
  • In February 2009 James reclaimed the Mustang from Eason and parked it at her driveway.
  • The Mustang was stolen on February 27, 2009; Safeco denied coverage and James sued for breach of contract.
  • The trial court granted Safeco summary judgment, ruling the policy void ab initio due to misrepresentations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Misstatements render policy void ab initio or voidable James argues misstatements are representations, not warranties. Safeco contends misstatements are warranties that void the policy ab initio. Misstatements are representations; voidable, not void ab initio.
Whether policy language clearly incorporates the application as part of the policy James contends the language does not clearly incorporate the application into the policy. Safeco argues the language shows incorporation by reference. Policy does not clearly incorporate the application; not a warranty.
Effect of warranty vs representation on post-loss liability James contends voidable policy may still cover losses after misstatement. Safeco argues a warranty voids the policy ab initio, potentially avoiding liability. Representations render policy voidable; insurer cannot avoid post-loss liability when loss has occurred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boggs, 27 Ohio St.2d 216 (Ohio 1971) (misstatement may be a warranty that voids ab initio if incorporated in policy)
  • Med. Protective Co. v. Fragatos, 190 Ohio App.3d 114 (Ohio 2010) (incorporation language and warning can render misstatements void ab initio)
  • Am. Family Ins. Co. v. Johnson, Ohio App.3d 93022 (Ohio 2010) (misstatements may be representations, not warranties, depending on policy language)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: James v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 25, 2011
Citation: 959 N.E.2d 599
Docket Number: 96077
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.