History
  • No items yet
midpage
James P. Renner v. At&t (068744)
218 N.J. 435
| N.J. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Cathleen Renner died of a pulmonary embolism while working from a home office for AT&T.
  • Renner filed a dependency claim under N.J.S.A. 34:15-7.2 for a cardiovascular death.
  • The Division and Appellate Division initially awarded/affirmed benefits under the 7.2 standard.
  • The Court granted certification to review the proper standard under 7.2.
  • Evidence included expert testimony: Dr. Waller linked sedentary work to DVT/PE; Dr. Kritzberg emphasized non-work risk factors.
  • Court reverses, holding no compensable cardiovascular claim under 7.2 on these facts.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether death resulted from a work effort or strain under 7.2 Renner argues 7.2 requires work effort causing death; prolonged sitting at work contributed to PE. AT&T contends no work-related substantial condition; risk factors and inactivity outside work dilute causation. No; failure to show work effort caused death under 7.2.
Whether extended sitting at work constitutes a substantial work-related condition Sitting during work hours caused hemodynamic stasis leading to PE. Sitting was not a work-imposed substantial condition beyond daily living. Not a work-related substantial condition; not compensable.
Whether the medical evidence supports work-related causation under 7.2 Waller’s probability-based link between sedentary work and PE supports causation. Kritzberg’s factors show non-work factors predominated; causation not established. Court found insufficient to meet 7.2 standard.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hellwig v. J.F. Rast & Co., 110 N.J. 37 (1988) (established the excess-of-wear-and-tear standard under 7.2)
  • Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co., 27 N.J. 127 (1958) (reaffirmed presumption but required claimant show work exposure increased risk)
  • Seiken v. Todd Dry Dock, Inc., 2 N.J. 469 (1949) (pre-7.2 history of strict vs. flexible causation standards)
  • Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487 (1962) (held claimant must prove work effort contributed in material degree to injury/death)
  • Fiore v. Consol. Freightways, 140 N.J. 452 (1995) (amended 7.2 to require substantial effort beyond daily living and material causation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: James P. Renner v. At&t (068744)
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jul 30, 2014
Citation: 218 N.J. 435
Docket Number: A-71-11
Court Abbreviation: N.J.