History
  • No items yet
midpage
James G. Davis Construction Corp. v. Erie Insurance Exchange
953 F. Supp. 2d 607
D. Maryland
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Davis sues Erie for breach of contract and seeks declaratory relief on attorneys’ fees/indemnification.
  • Erie moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; court treats as Rule 12(b)(1).
  • Erie is an unincorporated reciprocal insurance exchange; citizenship theory governs federal diversity.
  • Davis argues Erie’s members are policyholders; Erie contends policyholders are customers, not members.
  • Court holds Erie’s members include policyholders, so complete diversity between Davis and Erie’s members is required and not present.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is there complete diversity between Davis and Erie’s members? Davis asserts policyholders are Erie’s members. Erie argues policyholders are not members; customers. No complete diversity; diversity jurisdiction lacking.
What is Erie’s citizenship for diversity purposes? Erie’s members include policyholders from multiple states (e.g., VA, MD). Policyholders are not members; Erie’s citizenship tied to formation state. Erie’s members include policyholders, making Erie citizen of those states.
Should the court accept Erie’s Rule 12(b)(1) challenge and dismiss the case? Jurisdiction exists if diversity is satisfied. Lack of complete diversity defeats jurisdiction. Motion to Dismiss granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ware v. Jolly Roger Rides, Inc., 857 F. Supp. 462 (D. Md. 1994) (diversity requires complete citizenship among parties)
  • Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806) (foundation of complete diversity requirement)
  • Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Carroll Carolina Oil Co., Inc., 145 F.3d 660 (4th Cir. 1998) (corporate citizenship rules for diversity)
  • Clephas v. Fagelson, Shonberger, Payne & Arthur, 719 F.2d 92 (4th Cir. 1983) (unincorporated associations—citizenship of members)
  • Arbuthnot v. State Automobile Insurance Association, 264 F.2d 260 (10th Cir. 1959) (rejected notion unincorporated reciprocal insurers are only citizens of state of formation)
  • Davenport Insulation, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 616 F. Supp. 2d 578 (D. Md. 2009) (recognizes policyholders as Erie’s members for diversity purposes)
  • Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Quinn-L Capital Corp., 3 F.3d 877 (5th Cir. 1993) (distinguishes Lloyd’s plan from reciprocal exchanges)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: James G. Davis Construction Corp. v. Erie Insurance Exchange
Court Name: District Court, D. Maryland
Date Published: May 20, 2013
Citation: 953 F. Supp. 2d 607
Docket Number: Civil No. 12-2715 PJM
Court Abbreviation: D. Maryland